sample activities for critical thinking

41+ Critical Thinking Examples (Definition + Practices)

Critical thinking is an essential skill in our information-overloaded world, where figuring out what is fact and fiction has become increasingly challenging.

But why is critical thinking essential? Put, critical thinking empowers us to make better decisions, challenge and validate our beliefs and assumptions, and understand and interact with the world more effectively and meaningfully.

Critical thinking is like using your brain's "superpowers" to make smart choices. Whether it's picking the right insurance, deciding what to do in a job, or discussing topics in school, thinking deeply helps a lot. In the next parts, we'll share real-life examples of when this superpower comes in handy and give you some fun exercises to practice it.

Critical Thinking Process Outline

Critical thinking means thinking clearly and fairly without letting personal feelings get in the way. It's like being a detective, trying to solve a mystery by using clues and thinking hard about them.

It isn't always easy to think critically, as it can take a pretty smart person to see some of the questions that aren't being answered in a certain situation. But, we can train our brains to think more like puzzle solvers, which can help develop our critical thinking skills.

Here's what it looks like step by step:

Spotting the Problem: It's like discovering a puzzle to solve. You see that there's something you need to figure out or decide.

Collecting Clues: Now, you need to gather information. Maybe you read about it, watch a video, talk to people, or do some research. It's like getting all the pieces to solve your puzzle.

Breaking It Down: This is where you look at all your clues and try to see how they fit together. You're asking questions like: Why did this happen? What could happen next?

Checking Your Clues: You want to make sure your information is good. This means seeing if what you found out is true and if you can trust where it came from.

Making a Guess: After looking at all your clues, you think about what they mean and come up with an answer. This answer is like your best guess based on what you know.

Explaining Your Thoughts: Now, you tell others how you solved the puzzle. You explain how you thought about it and how you answered. 

Checking Your Work: This is like looking back and seeing if you missed anything. Did you make any mistakes? Did you let any personal feelings get in the way? This step helps make sure your thinking is clear and fair.

And remember, you might sometimes need to go back and redo some steps if you discover something new. If you realize you missed an important clue, you might have to go back and collect more information.

Critical Thinking Methods

Just like doing push-ups or running helps our bodies get stronger, there are special exercises that help our brains think better. These brain workouts push us to think harder, look at things closely, and ask many questions.

It's not always about finding the "right" answer. Instead, it's about the journey of thinking and asking "why" or "how." Doing these exercises often helps us become better thinkers and makes us curious to know more about the world.

Now, let's look at some brain workouts to help us think better:

1. "What If" Scenarios

Imagine crazy things happening, like, "What if there was no internet for a month? What would we do?" These games help us think of new and different ideas.

Pick a hot topic. Argue one side of it and then try arguing the opposite. This makes us see different viewpoints and think deeply about a topic.

3. Analyze Visual Data

Check out charts or pictures with lots of numbers and info but no explanations. What story are they telling? This helps us get better at understanding information just by looking at it.

4. Mind Mapping

Write an idea in the center and then draw lines to related ideas. It's like making a map of your thoughts. This helps us see how everything is connected.

There's lots of mind-mapping software , but it's also nice to do this by hand.

5. Weekly Diary

Every week, write about what happened, the choices you made, and what you learned. Writing helps us think about our actions and how we can do better.

6. Evaluating Information Sources

Collect stories or articles about one topic from newspapers or blogs. Which ones are trustworthy? Which ones might be a little biased? This teaches us to be smart about where we get our info.

There are many resources to help you determine if information sources are factual or not.

7. Socratic Questioning

This way of thinking is called the Socrates Method, named after an old-time thinker from Greece. It's about asking lots of questions to understand a topic. You can do this by yourself or chat with a friend.

Start with a Big Question:

"What does 'success' mean?"

Dive Deeper with More Questions:

"Why do you think of success that way?" "Do TV shows, friends, or family make you think that?" "Does everyone think about success the same way?"

"Can someone be a winner even if they aren't rich or famous?" "Can someone feel like they didn't succeed, even if everyone else thinks they did?"

Look for Real-life Examples:

"Who is someone you think is successful? Why?" "Was there a time you felt like a winner? What happened?"

Think About Other People's Views:

"How might a person from another country think about success?" "Does the idea of success change as we grow up or as our life changes?"

Think About What It Means:

"How does your idea of success shape what you want in life?" "Are there problems with only wanting to be rich or famous?"

Look Back and Think:

"After talking about this, did your idea of success change? How?" "Did you learn something new about what success means?"

8. Six Thinking Hats 

Edward de Bono came up with a cool way to solve problems by thinking in six different ways, like wearing different colored hats. You can do this independently, but it might be more effective in a group so everyone can have a different hat color. Each color has its way of thinking:

White Hat (Facts): Just the facts! Ask, "What do we know? What do we need to find out?"

Red Hat (Feelings): Talk about feelings. Ask, "How do I feel about this?"

Black Hat (Careful Thinking): Be cautious. Ask, "What could go wrong?"

Yellow Hat (Positive Thinking): Look on the bright side. Ask, "What's good about this?"

Green Hat (Creative Thinking): Think of new ideas. Ask, "What's another way to look at this?"

Blue Hat (Planning): Organize the talk. Ask, "What should we do next?"

When using this method with a group:

• Explain all the hats.
• Decide which hat to wear first.
• Make sure everyone switches hats at the same time.
• Finish with the Blue Hat to plan the next steps.

9. SWOT Analysis

SWOT Analysis is like a game plan for businesses to know where they stand and where they should go. "SWOT" stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.

There are a lot of SWOT templates out there for how to do this visually, but you can also think it through. It doesn't just apply to businesses but can be a good way to decide if a project you're working on is working.

Strengths: What's working well? Ask, "What are we good at?"

Weaknesses: Where can we do better? Ask, "Where can we improve?"

Opportunities: What good things might come our way? Ask, "What chances can we grab?"

Threats: What challenges might we face? Ask, "What might make things tough for us?"

Steps to do a SWOT Analysis:

• Goal: Decide what you want to find out.
• Research: Learn about your business and the world around it.
• Brainstorm: Get a group and think together. Talk about strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
• Pick the Most Important Points: Some things might be more urgent or important than others.
• Make a Plan: Decide what to do based on your SWOT list.
• Check Again Later: Things change, so look at your SWOT again after a while to update it.

Now that you have a few tools for thinking critically, let’s get into some specific examples.

Everyday Examples

Life is a series of decisions. From the moment we wake up, we're faced with choices – some trivial, like choosing a breakfast cereal, and some more significant, like buying a home or confronting an ethical dilemma at work. While it might seem that these decisions are disparate, they all benefit from the application of critical thinking.

10. Deciding to buy something

Imagine you want a new phone. Don't just buy it because the ad looks cool. Think about what you need in a phone. Look up different phones and see what people say about them. Choose the one that's the best deal for what you want.

11. Deciding what is true

There's a lot of news everywhere. Don't believe everything right away. Think about why someone might be telling you this. Check if what you're reading or watching is true. Make up your mind after you've looked into it.

12. Deciding when you’re wrong

Sometimes, friends can have disagreements. Don't just get mad right away. Try to see where they're coming from. Talk about what's going on. Find a way to fix the problem that's fair for everyone.

13. Deciding what to eat

There's always a new diet or exercise that's popular. Don't just follow it because it's trendy. Find out if it's good for you. Ask someone who knows, like a doctor. Make choices that make you feel good and stay healthy.

14. Deciding what to do today

Everyone is busy with school, chores, and hobbies. Make a list of things you need to do. Decide which ones are most important. Plan your day so you can get things done and still have fun.

15. Making Tough Choices

Sometimes, it's hard to know what's right. Think about how each choice will affect you and others. Talk to people you trust about it. Choose what feels right in your heart and is fair to others.

16. Planning for the Future

Big decisions, like where to go to school, can be tricky. Think about what you want in the future. Look at the good and bad of each choice. Talk to people who know about it. Pick what feels best for your dreams and goals.

Job Examples

17. solving problems.

Workers brainstorm ways to fix a machine quickly without making things worse when a machine breaks at a factory.

18. Decision Making

A store manager decides which products to order more of based on what's selling best.

19. Setting Goals

A team leader helps their team decide what tasks are most important to finish this month and which can wait.

20. Evaluating Ideas

At a team meeting, everyone shares ideas for a new project. The group discusses each idea's pros and cons before picking one.

21. Handling Conflict

Two workers disagree on how to do a job. Instead of arguing, they talk calmly, listen to each other, and find a solution they both like.

22. Improving Processes

A cashier thinks of a faster way to ring up items so customers don't have to wait as long.

23. Asking Questions

Before starting a big task, an employee asks for clear instructions and checks if they have the necessary tools.

24. Checking Facts

Before presenting a report, someone double-checks all their information to make sure there are no mistakes.

25. Planning for the Future

A business owner thinks about what might happen in the next few years, like new competitors or changes in what customers want, and makes plans based on those thoughts.

26. Understanding Perspectives

A team is designing a new toy. They think about what kids and parents would both like instead of just what they think is fun.

School Examples

27. researching a topic.

For a history project, a student looks up different sources to understand an event from multiple viewpoints.

28. Debating an Issue

In a class discussion, students pick sides on a topic, like school uniforms, and share reasons to support their views.

29. Evaluating Sources

While writing an essay, a student checks if the information from a website is trustworthy or might be biased.

30. Problem Solving in Math

When stuck on a tricky math problem, a student tries different methods to find the answer instead of giving up.

31. Analyzing Literature

In English class, students discuss why a character in a book made certain choices and what those decisions reveal about them.

32. Testing a Hypothesis

For a science experiment, students guess what will happen and then conduct tests to see if they're right or wrong.

33. Giving Peer Feedback

After reading a classmate's essay, a student offers suggestions for improving it.

34. Questioning Assumptions

In a geography lesson, students consider why certain countries are called "developed" and what that label means.

35. Designing a Study

For a psychology project, students plan an experiment to understand how people's memories work and think of ways to ensure accurate results.

36. Interpreting Data

In a science class, students look at charts and graphs from a study, then discuss what the information tells them and if there are any patterns.

Critical Thinking Puzzles

Not all scenarios will have a single correct answer that can be figured out by thinking critically. Sometimes we have to think critically about ethical choices or moral behaviors. 

Here are some mind games and scenarios you can solve using critical thinking. You can see the solution(s) at the end of the post.

37. The Farmer, Fox, Chicken, and Grain Problem

A farmer is at a riverbank with a fox, a chicken, and a grain bag. He needs to get all three items across the river. However, his boat can only carry himself and one of the three items at a time. 

Here's the challenge:

• If the fox is left alone with the chicken, the fox will eat the chicken.
• If the chicken is left alone with the grain, the chicken will eat the grain.

How can the farmer get all three items across the river without any item being eaten? 

38. The Rope, Jar, and Pebbles Problem

You are in a room with two long ropes hanging from the ceiling. Each rope is just out of arm's reach from the other, so you can't hold onto one rope and reach the other simultaneously. 

Your task is to tie the two rope ends together, but you can't move the position where they hang from the ceiling.

You are given a jar full of pebbles. How do you complete the task?

39. The Two Guards Problem

Imagine there are two doors. One door leads to certain doom, and the other leads to freedom. You don't know which is which.

In front of each door stands a guard. One guard always tells the truth. The other guard always lies. You don't know which guard is which.

You can ask only one question to one of the guards. What question should you ask to find the door that leads to freedom?

40. The Hourglass Problem

You have two hourglasses. One measures 7 minutes when turned over, and the other measures 4 minutes. Using just these hourglasses, how can you time exactly 9 minutes?

41. The Lifeboat Dilemma

Imagine you're on a ship that's sinking. You get on a lifeboat, but it's already too full and might flip over. 

Nearby in the water, five people are struggling: a scientist close to finding a cure for a sickness, an old couple who've been together for a long time, a mom with three kids waiting at home, and a tired teenager who helped save others but is now in danger. 

You can only save one person without making the boat flip. Who would you choose?

42. The Tech Dilemma

You work at a tech company and help make a computer program to help small businesses. You're almost ready to share it with everyone, but you find out there might be a small chance it has a problem that could show users' private info. 

If you decide to fix it, you must wait two more months before sharing it. But your bosses want you to share it now. What would you do?

43. The History Mystery

Dr. Amelia is a history expert. She's studying where a group of people traveled long ago. She reads old letters and documents to learn about it. But she finds some letters that tell a different story than what most people believe. 

If she says this new story is true, it could change what people learn in school and what they think about history. What should she do?

The Role of Bias in Critical Thinking

Have you ever decided you don’t like someone before you even know them? Or maybe someone shared an idea with you that you immediately loved without even knowing all the details. 

This experience is called bias, which occurs when you like or dislike something or someone without a good reason or knowing why. It can also take shape in certain reactions to situations, like a habit or instinct. 

Bias comes from our own experiences, what friends or family tell us, or even things we are born believing. Sometimes, bias can help us stay safe, but other times it stops us from seeing the truth.

Not all bias is bad. Bias can be a mechanism for assessing our potential safety in a new situation. If we are biased to think that anything long, thin, and curled up is a snake, we might assume the rope is something to be afraid of before we know it is just a rope.

While bias might serve us in some situations (like jumping out of the way of an actual snake before we have time to process that we need to be jumping out of the way), it often harms our ability to think critically.

How Bias Gets in the Way of Good Thinking

Selective Perception: We only notice things that match our ideas and ignore the rest. 

It's like only picking red candies from a mixed bowl because you think they taste the best, but they taste the same as every other candy in the bowl. It could also be when we see all the signs that our partner is cheating on us but choose to ignore them because we are happy the way we are (or at least, we think we are).

Agreeing with Yourself: This is called “ confirmation bias ” when we only listen to ideas that match our own and seek, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms what we already think we know or believe. 

An example is when someone wants to know if it is safe to vaccinate their children but already believes that vaccines are not safe, so they only look for information supporting the idea that vaccines are bad.

Thinking We Know It All: Similar to confirmation bias, this is called “overconfidence bias.” Sometimes we think our ideas are the best and don't listen to others. This can stop us from learning.

Have you ever met someone who you consider a “know it”? Probably, they have a lot of overconfidence bias because while they may know many things accurately, they can’t know everything. Still, if they act like they do, they show overconfidence bias.

There's a weird kind of bias similar to this called the Dunning Kruger Effect, and that is when someone is bad at what they do, but they believe and act like they are the best .

Following the Crowd: This is formally called “groupthink”. It's hard to speak up with a different idea if everyone agrees. But this can lead to mistakes.

An example of this we’ve all likely seen is the cool clique in primary school. There is usually one person that is the head of the group, the “coolest kid in school”, and everyone listens to them and does what they want, even if they don’t think it’s a good idea.

How to Overcome Biases

Here are a few ways to learn to think better, free from our biases (or at least aware of them!).

Know Your Biases: Realize that everyone has biases. If we know about them, we can think better.

Listen to Different People: Talking to different kinds of people can give us new ideas.

Ask Why: Always ask yourself why you believe something. Is it true, or is it just a bias?

Understand Others: Try to think about how others feel. It helps you see things in new ways.

Keep Learning: Always be curious and open to new information.

In today's world, everything changes fast, and there's so much information everywhere. This makes critical thinking super important. It helps us distinguish between what's real and what's made up. It also helps us make good choices. But thinking this way can be tough sometimes because of biases. These are like sneaky thoughts that can trick us. The good news is we can learn to see them and think better.

There are cool tools and ways we've talked about, like the "Socratic Questioning" method and the "Six Thinking Hats." These tools help us get better at thinking. These thinking skills can also help us in school, work, and everyday life.

We’ve also looked at specific scenarios where critical thinking would be helpful, such as deciding what diet to follow and checking facts.

Thinking isn't just a skill—it's a special talent we improve over time. Working on it lets us see things more clearly and understand the world better. So, keep practicing and asking questions! It'll make you a smarter thinker and help you see the world differently.

Critical Thinking Puzzles (Solutions)

The farmer, fox, chicken, and grain problem.

• The farmer first takes the chicken across the river and leaves it on the other side.
• He returns to the original side and takes the fox across the river.
• After leaving the fox on the other side, he returns the chicken to the starting side.
• He leaves the chicken on the starting side and takes the grain bag across the river.
• He leaves the grain with the fox on the other side and returns to get the chicken.
• The farmer takes the chicken across, and now all three items -- the fox, the chicken, and the grain -- are safely on the other side of the river.

The Rope, Jar, and Pebbles Problem

• Take one rope and tie the jar of pebbles to its end.
• Swing the rope with the jar in a pendulum motion.
• While the rope is swinging, grab the other rope and wait.
• As the swinging rope comes back within reach due to its pendulum motion, grab it.
• With both ropes within reach, untie the jar and tie the rope ends together.

The Two Guards Problem

The question is, "What would the other guard say is the door to doom?" Then choose the opposite door.

The Hourglass Problem

• Start both hourglasses. 
• When the 4-minute hourglass runs out, turn it over.
• When the 7-minute hourglass runs out, the 4-minute hourglass will have been running for 3 minutes. Turn the 7-minute hourglass over. 
• When the 4-minute hourglass runs out for the second time (a total of 8 minutes have passed), the 7-minute hourglass will run for 1 minute. Turn the 7-minute hourglass again for 1 minute to empty the hourglass (a total of 9 minutes passed).

The Boat and Weights Problem

Take the cat over first and leave it on the other side. Then, return and take the fish across next. When you get there, take the cat back with you. Leave the cat on the starting side and take the cat food across. Lastly, return to get the cat and bring it to the other side.

The Lifeboat Dilemma

There isn’t one correct answer to this problem. Here are some elements to consider:

• Moral Principles: What values guide your decision? Is it the potential greater good for humanity (the scientist)? What is the value of long-standing love and commitment (the elderly couple)? What is the future of young children who depend on their mothers? Or the selfless bravery of the teenager?
• Future Implications: Consider the future consequences of each choice. Saving the scientist might benefit millions in the future, but what moral message does it send about the value of individual lives?
• Emotional vs. Logical Thinking: While it's essential to engage empathy, it's also crucial not to let emotions cloud judgment entirely. For instance, while the teenager's bravery is commendable, does it make him more deserving of a spot on the boat than the others?
• Acknowledging Uncertainty: The scientist claims to be close to a significant breakthrough, but there's no certainty. How does this uncertainty factor into your decision?
• Personal Bias: Recognize and challenge any personal biases, such as biases towards age, profession, or familial status.

The Tech Dilemma

Again, there isn’t one correct answer to this problem. Here are some elements to consider:

• Evaluate the Risk: How severe is the potential vulnerability? Can it be easily exploited, or would it require significant expertise? Even if the circumstances are rare, what would be the consequences if the vulnerability were exploited?
• Stakeholder Considerations: Different stakeholders will have different priorities. Upper management might prioritize financial projections, the marketing team might be concerned about the product's reputation, and customers might prioritize the security of their data. How do you balance these competing interests?
• Short-Term vs. Long-Term Implications: While launching on time could meet immediate financial goals, consider the potential long-term damage to the company's reputation if the vulnerability is exploited. Would the short-term gains be worth the potential long-term costs?
• Ethical Implications : Beyond the financial and reputational aspects, there's an ethical dimension to consider. Is it right to release a product with a known vulnerability, even if the chances of it being exploited are low?
• Seek External Input: Consulting with cybersecurity experts outside your company might be beneficial. They could provide a more objective risk assessment and potential mitigation strategies.
• Communication: How will you communicate the decision, whatever it may be, both internally to your team and upper management and externally to your customers and potential users?

The History Mystery

Dr. Amelia should take the following steps:

• Verify the Letters: Before making any claims, she should check if the letters are actual and not fake. She can do this by seeing when and where they were written and if they match with other things from that time.
• Get a Second Opinion: It's always good to have someone else look at what you've found. Dr. Amelia could show the letters to other history experts and see their thoughts.
• Research More: Maybe there are more documents or letters out there that support this new story. Dr. Amelia should keep looking to see if she can find more evidence.
• Share the Findings: If Dr. Amelia believes the letters are true after all her checks, she should tell others. This can be through books, talks, or articles.
• Stay Open to Feedback: Some people might agree with Dr. Amelia, and others might not. She should listen to everyone and be ready to learn more or change her mind if new information arises.

Ultimately, Dr. Amelia's job is to find out the truth about history and share it. It's okay if this new truth differs from what people used to believe. History is about learning from the past, no matter the story.

Related posts:

• Experimenter Bias (Definition + Examples)
• Hasty Generalization Fallacy (31 Examples + Similar Names)
• Ad Hoc Fallacy (29 Examples + Other Names)
• Confirmation Bias (Examples + Definition)
• Equivocation Fallacy (26 Examples + Description)

Reference this article:

About The Author

Free Personality Test

Free Memory Test

Free IQ Test

PracticalPie.com is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow Us On:

Youtube Facebook Instagram X/Twitter

Psychology Resources

Developmental

Personality

Relationships

Psychologists

Serial Killers

Psychology Tests

Personality Quiz

Memory Test

Depression test

Type A/B Personality Test

© PracticalPsychology. All rights reserved

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

• Productivity
• Thoughtful learning

Become a better critical thinker with these 7 critical thinking exercises

Critical thinking is a skill you can use in any situation. Whether you're a student, entrepreneur, or business executive, critical thinking can help you make better decisions and solve problems.

But learning critical thinking skills isn't always an easy task. Many tools, techniques, and strategies are available, and choosing the right one can be challenging. Vague suggestions on the internet like "read more" aren't very helpful, and elaborate business examples don’t apply to many of us.

As average problem-solvers, we need actionable thinking exercises to improve our critical thinking skills and enhance our thinking processes. Regularly performing exercises that specifically stretch our decision-making and reasoning skills is the most effective method of improving our thinking abilities.

This article will explore several exercises that will help you develop critical thinking skills. Whether you are preparing for an exam, making an influential decision for your business, or going about your daily life, these fun activities can build your reasoning skills and creative problem-solving abilities.

Boost your logical thinking skills and start practicing a critical mindset with these 10 critical thinking exercises.

A Quick Look at Critical Thinking

As a thoughtful learner, you likely already understand the basics of critical thinking, but here's a quick refresher.

Critical thinking involves analyzing problems or issues objectively and rationally. Critical thinkers are able to understand their own biases and assumptions, as well as those of others. They’re also able to see the world from a different point of view and understand how their experiences impact their thinking.

Developing critical thinking skills is essential because it allows us to see things from multiple perspectives, identify biases and errors in reasoning, and be open to possible solutions. Making informed decisions is easier when we have a better understanding of the world around us.

Why We Need to Practice Critical Thinking

We aren't born with critical thinking skills, and they don’t naturally develop beyond survival-level thinking. To master critical thinking, we must practice it and develop it over time.

However, learning to think critically isn't as easy as learning to ride a bicycle. There aren't any step-by-step procedures to follow or supportive guides to fall back on, and it is not taught in public schools consistently or reliably. To ensure students' success, teachers must know higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and how to teach them, research says.

Unfortunately, although teachers understand the importance of HOTS and attempt to teach it, studies show that their capacity to measure students' HOTS is low. Educator and author Dr. Kulvarn Atwal says, "It seems that we are becoming successful at producing students who are able to jump through hoops and pass tests."

As critical thinking skills become more important in higher grades, some students find it challenging to understand the concept of critical thinking. To develop necessary thinking skills, we must set aside our assumptions and beliefs. This allows us to explore and question topics from a "blank page" point of view and distinguish fact from opinion.

Be the first to try it out!

We're developing ABLE, a powerful tool for building your personal knowledge, capturing information from the web, conducting research, taking notes, and writing content.

7 Critical Thinking Exercises To Improve Your Critical Thinking Skills

The good news is that by assessing, analyzing, and evaluating our thought processes, we can improve our skills. Critical thinking exercises are key to this improvement. Our critical thinking builds and improves with regular practice, just like a muscle that gets stronger with use.

If you want to become a better critical thinker , here are some critical thinking exercises to try:

Exercise #1: The Ladder of Inference

You can exercise your critical thinking skills by using the Ladder of Inference model . This thinking model was developed by renowned organizational psychologist Chris Argyris. Each rung on the ladder of inference represents a step you take to arrive at your conclusions.

The decision-making process starts when we are faced with a problem or situation. As soon as we observe something problematic or important, we presume what is causing it, and then we use that assumption to draw conclusions. Based on those conclusions, we take action.

For example, say you're at a party and see a friend across the room. You catch their eye and wave, but they turn and walk away. Using the ladder, you might climb the rungs as follows:

• Observe that your friend walked away.
• Select a few details of the situation, including your wave and your assumption that they saw you.
• Meaning is attached based on the environment, making you think your friend must have other people to talk to at the party.
• Assumptions are made based on that meaning, assuming that means your friend doesn’t like you as much as them.
• Conclusions are drawn from the assumption, and you determine that your friend must be mad at you or doesn't want you to be at the party.
• Beliefs are formed, making you think you're not welcome.
• Action is taken, and you leave the party.

In this example, you started with a situation (someone walking away at a crowded party) and made a series of inferences to arrive at a conclusion (that the person is mad at you and doesn't want you there).

The Ladder of Inference can be a helpful tool to frame your thinking because it encourages you to examine each step of your thought process and avoid jumping to conclusions. It's easy to make assumptions without realizing it, as in this scene. Perhaps your friend never even saw you wave from across the crowded room.

Exercise #2: The Five Whys

The "Five Whys" technique is an analytical skill that can help you uncover the source of a problem. The activity was created by Sakichi Toyoda, the founder of Toyota, and consists of repeatedly asking “why?” when a problem is encountered to determine its root cause.

This exercise can be difficult because knowing if you've discovered the source of your problem is challenging. The "five" in "Five Whys" is just a guideline — you may need to ask more. When you can't ask anything else, and your response is related to the original issue, you've probably arrived at the end.

Even if you need several rounds of questioning, just keep going. The important part that helps you practice critical thinking is the process of asking "why?" and uncovering the deeper issues affecting the situation.

For instance, say you're trying to figure out why your computer keeps crashing.

• You ask " why ," and the answer is that there's a software problem.
• Why? Because the computer keeps running out of memory.
• Why? Because too many programs are running at the same time.
• Why? Because too many browser tabs are open .
• Why? Because multitasking is fragmenting your focus, you're doing too many things at once.

In this example, working through the "why's" revealed the underlying cause. As a result, you can find the best solution, which is concentrating on just one thing at a time.

Exercise #3: Inversion

Inversion is another critical thinking exercise that you can use in any situation. Inversion is sort of like taking on the role of the devil's advocate. In this exercise, adopt the opposite view of whatever issue you're exploring and consider the potential arguments for that side. This will help broaden your critical thinking skills and enable you to see other perspectives on a situation or topic more clearly.

For example, let's say you're thinking about starting your own business. Using inversion, you would explore all of the potential arguments for why starting your own business is bad. This might include concerns like:

• You could end up in debt.
• The business might fail.
• It's a lot of work.
• You might not have time for anything else.

By exploring these potentially adverse outcomes, you can identify the potential risks involved in starting your own business and make a more sound decision. You might realize that now is not the right time for you to become an entrepreneur. And if you do start the company, you'll be better prepared to deal with the issues you identified when they occur.

Exercise #4: Argument Mapping

Argument mapping can be a beneficial exercise for enhancing critical thinking skills. Like mind mapping, argument mapping is a method of visually representing an argument's structure. It helps analyze and evaluate ideas as well as develop new ones.

In critical thinking textbooks, argument diagramming is often presented to introduce students to argument constructions. It can be an effective way to build mental templates or schema for argument structures, which researchers think may make critical evaluation easier .

Argument maps typically include the following:

• Conclusion: What is being argued for or against
• Premises: The reasons given to support the conclusion
• Inferences: The connections made between the premises and conclusion

The argument map should be as clear and concise as possible, with a single word or phrase representing each element. This will help you make connections more easily. After the map is completed, you can use it to identify any weak points in the argument. If any areas aren't well-supported, additional premises can be added.

Argument mapping can be applied to any situation that requires critical thinking skills. The more time you take to map out an argument, the better you'll understand how the pieces fit together. Ultimately, this will help you think more creatively and critically, and make more informed decisions.

Exercise #5: Opinion vs. Fact

Critical thinking activities that focus on opinions and facts are particularly valuable and relevant new learning opportunities. Our constantly-connected world makes it easy to confuse opinions and facts , especially with sensationalist news articles and click-bait headlines.

How can you tell a fact from an opinion? Facts are generally objective and established, whereas opinions are subjective and unproven. For example, "the cloud is in the air" is a fact. "That dress looks good on you" is an opinion.

Practice your critical thinking skills by reading or listening to the news. See if you can identify when someone is stating an opinion rather than a fact. Ask yourself the following questions:

• Who is saying what? What reasons might be behind their statements?
• Does the claim make sense? Who would disagree with it and why?
• How can you tell if the data is reliable? Can it be fact-checked? Has it been shared by other credible publishers?
• How do you know whether or not the presenter is biased? What kind of language is being used?

This powerful exercise can train your mind to start asking questions whenever presented with a new claim. This will help you think critically about the information you're taking in and question what you're hearing before accepting it as truth.

Exercise #6: Autonomy of an Object

In her book " The Critical Thinking Tool Kit ," Dr. Marlene Caroselli describes a critical thinking exercise called "Living Problems, Lively Solutions." This exercise uses the autonomy of an object as a problem-solving tool to find a possible solution.

To do this, you'll personify your problem and place it in another context — a different time or place. This allows you to uncover unique solutions to the problem that might be tied to your mental associations with that setting.

For example, if your problem is poor time management , you might personify the issue as a thief of your time. The idea of a thief could make you think of jail, which might prompt thoughts of locking up specific distractions in your life. The idea of jail could also make you think of guards and lead you to the possible solution of checking in with an accountability buddy who can make sure you're sticking to your schedule.

The autonomy-of-object technique works because it stimulates thoughts you wouldn’t have considered without the particular context in which you place the problem.

Exercise #7: The Six Thinking Hats

Designed by Edward de Bono, the Six Thinking Hats is a critical thinking exercise that was created as a tool for groups to use when exploring different perspectives on an issue. When people use other thinking processes, meetings can become challenging rather than beneficial.

To help teams work more productively and mindfully, de Bono suggests dividing up different styles of thinking into six categories, represented as hats:

• The white hat is objective and focuses on facts and logic
• The red hat is intuitive, focusing on emotion and instinct
• The black hat is cautious and predicts negative outcomes
• The yellow hat is optimistic and encourages positive outcomes
• The green hat is creative, with numerous ideas and little criticism
• The blue hat is the control hat used for management and organization

With each team member wearing a different hat, a group can examine an issue or problem from many different angles, preventing one viewpoint (or individual) from dominating the meeting or discussion. This means that decisions and solutions reached using the Six Thinking Hats approach will likely be more robust and effective, and everyone’s creative thinking skills will benefit.

Train Your Brain With Critical Thinking Exercises

Using critical thinking regularly in various situations can improve our ability to evaluate and analyze information. These seven critical thinking exercises train your brain for better critical thinking skills . With daily practice, they can become habits that will help you think more critically each day.

Improve your critical thinking with ABLE

Ask better questions and get better answers with ABLEs integrated web search, annotation and note-taking features. Check how ABLE helps you to improve your critical thinking.

I hope you have enjoyed reading this article. Feel free to share, recommend and connect 🙏

Connect with me on Twitter 👉   https://twitter.com/iamborisv

And follow Able's journey on Twitter: https://twitter.com/meet_able

And subscribe to our newsletter to read more valuable articles before it gets published on our blog.

Now we're building a Discord community of like-minded people, and we would be honoured and delighted to see you there.

Straight from the ABLE team: how we work and what we build. Thoughts, learnings, notes, experiences and what really matters.

Read more posts by this author

follow me :

Mental models: 13 thinking tools to boost your problem-solving skills

7 note-taking strategies to improve your study skills.

What is abstract thinking? 10 activities to improve your abstract thinking skills

5 examples of cognitive learning theory (and how you can use them)

0 results found.

• Aegis Alpha SA
• We build in public

Building with passion in

50 Super-Fun Critical Thinking Strategies to Use in Your Classroom

by AuthorAmy

Teaching students to be critical thinkers is perhaps the most important goal in education. All teachers, regardless of subject area, contribute to the process of teaching students to think for themselves. However, it’s not always an easy skill to teach. Students need guidance and practice with critical thinking strategies at every level.

One problem with teaching critical thinking is that many different definitions of this skill exist. The Foundation for Critical Thinking offers four different definitions of the concept. Essentially, critical thinking is the ability to evaluate information and decide what we think about that information, a cumulative portfolio of skills our students need to be successful problem solvers in an ever-changing world.

Here is a list of 50 classroom strategies for teachers to use to foster critical thinking among students of all ages.

1. Don’t give them the answers  

Learning is supposed to be hard, and while it may be tempting to jump in and direct students to the right answer, it’s better to let them work through a problem on their own. A good teacher is a guide, not an answer key. The goal is to help students work at their “challenge” level, as opposed to their “frustration” level.

2. Controversial issue barometer

In this activity, a line is drawn down the center of the classroom. The middle represents the neutral ground, and the ends of the line represent extremes of an issue. The teacher selects an issue and students space themselves along the line according to their opinions. Being able to articulate opinions and participate in civil discourse are important aspects of critical thinking.

3. Play devil’s advocate

During a robust classroom discussion, an effective teacher challenges students by acting as devil’s advocate, no matter their personal opinion. “I don’t care WHAT you think, I just care THAT you think” is my classroom mantra. Critical thinking strategies that ask students to analyze both sides of an issue help create understanding and empathy.

4. Gallery walk

In a gallery walk, the teacher hangs images around the classroom related to the unit at hand (photographs, political cartoons, paintings). Students peruse the artwork much like they are in a museum, writing down their thoughts about each piece.

5. Review something

A movie, TV show , a book, a restaurant, a pep assembly, today’s lesson – anything can be reviewed. Writing a review involves the complex skill of summary without spoilers and asks students to share their opinion and back it up with evidence.

6. Draw analogies

Pick two unrelated things and ask students how those things are alike (for example, how is a museum like a snowstorm). The goal here is to encourage creativity and look for similarities.

7. Think of 25 uses for an everyday thing

Pick an everyday object (I use my camera tripod) and set a timer for five minutes. Challenge students to come up with 25 things they can use the object for within that time frame. The obvious answers will be exhausted quickly, so ridiculous answers such as “coatrack” and “stool” are encouraged.

8. Incorporate riddles

Students love riddles. You could pose a question at the beginning of the week and allow students to ask questions about it all week.

9. Crosswords and sudoku puzzles

The games section of the newspaper provides great brainteasers for students who finish their work early and need some extra brain stimulation.

10. Fine tune questioning techniques

A vibrant classroom discussion is made even better by a teacher who asks excellent, provocative questions. Questions should move beyond those with concrete answers to a place where students must examine why they think the way they do.

11. Socratic seminar

The Socratic seminar is perhaps the ultimate critical thinking activity. Students are given a universal question, such as “Do you believe it is acceptable to break the law if you believe the law is wrong?” They are given time to prepare and answer, and then, seated in a circle, students are directed to discuss the topic. Whereas the goal of a debate is to win, the goal of a Socratic discussion is for the group to reach greater understanding.

12. Inquiry based learning

In inquiry-based learning, students develop questions they want answers to, which drives the curriculum toward issues they care about. An engaged learner is an essential step in critical thinking.

13. Problem-based learning

In problem-based learning, students are given a problem and asked to develop research-based solutions. The problem can be a school problem (the lunchroom is overcrowded) or a global problem (sea levels are rising).

14. Challenge all assumptions

The teacher must model this before students learn to apply this skill on their own. In this strategy, a teacher helps a student understand where his or her ingrained beliefs come from. Perhaps a student tells you they believe that stereotypes exist because they are true. An effective teacher can ask “Why do you think that?” and keep exploring the issue as students delve into the root of their beliefs. Question everything.

15. Emphasize data over beliefs

Data does not always support our beliefs, so our first priority must be to seek out data before drawing conclusions.

16. Teach confirmation bias

Confirmation bias is the human tendency to seek out information that confirms what we already believe, rather than letting the data inform our conclusions. Understanding that this phenomenon exists can help students avoid it.

17. Visualization

Help students make a plan before tackling a task.

18. Mind mapping

Mind mapping is a visual way to organize information. Students start with a central concept and create a web with subtopics that radiate outward.

19. Develop empathy

Empathy is often cited as an aspect of critical thinking. To do so, encourage students to think from a different point of view. They might write a “con” essay when they believe the “pro,” or write a letter from someone else’s perspective.

20. Summarization

Summarizing means taking all the information given and presenting it in a shortened fashion.

21. Encapsulation

Encapsulation is a skill different from summarization. To encapsulate a topic, students must learn about it and then distill it down to its most relevant points, which means students are forming judgements about what is most and least important.

22. Weigh cause and effect

The process of examining cause and effect helps students develop critical thinking skills by thinking through the natural consequences of a given choice.

23. Problems in a jar

Perfect for a bell-ringer, a teacher can stuff a mason jar with dilemmas that their students might face, such as, “Your best friend is refusing to talk to you today. What do you do?” Then, discuss possible answers. This works well for ethical dilemmas, too.

24. Transform one thing into another

Give students an object, like a pencil or a mug. Define its everyday use (to write or to drink from). Then, tell the students to transform the object into something with an entirely separate use. Now what is it used for?

25. Which one doesn’t belong?

Group items together and ask students to find the one that doesn’t belong. In first grade, this might be a grouping of vowels and a consonant; in high school, it might be heavy metals and a noble gas.

26. Compare/contrast

Compare and contrast are important critical thinking strategies. Students can create a Venn diagram to show similarities or differences, or they could write a good old-fashioned compare/contrast essay about the characters of Romeo and Juliet .

27. Pick a word, find a related word

This is another fun bell-ringer activity. The teacher starts with any word, and students go around the room and say another word related to that one. The obvious words go quickly, meaning the longer the game goes on, the more out-of-the-box the thinking gets.

28. Ranking of sources

Give students a research topic and tell them to find three sources (books, YouTube videos, websites). Then ask them, what resource is best – and why.

29. Hypothesize

The very act of hypothesizing is critical thinking in action. Students are using what they know to find an answer to something they don’t know.

30. Guess what will happen next

This works for scientific reactions, novels, current events, and more. Simply spell out what we know so far and ask students “and then what?”

31. Practice inference

Inference is the art of making an educated guess based on evidence presented and is an important component of critical thinking.

32. Connect text to self

Ask students to draw connections between what they are reading about to something happening in their world. For example, if their class is studying global warming, researching how global warming might impact their hometown will help make their studies relevant.

33. Levels of questioning

There are several levels of questions (as few as three and as many as six, depending on who you ask). These include factual questions, which have a right or wrong answer (most math problems are factual questions). There are also inferential questions, which ask students to make inferences based on both opinion and textual evidence. Additionally, there are universal questions, which are “big picture” questions where there are no right or wrong answers.

Students should practice answering all levels of questions and writing their own questions, too.

34. Demand precise language

An expansive vocabulary allows a student to express themselves more exactly, and precision is a major tool in the critical thinking toolkit.

35. Identify bias and hidden agendas

Helping students to critically examine biases in sources will help them evaluate the trustworthiness of their sources.

36. Identify unanswered questions

After a unit of study is conducted, lead students through a discussion of what questions remain unanswered. In this way, students can work to develop a lifelong learner mentality.

37. Relate a topic in one subject area to other disciplines

Have students take something they are studying in your class and relate it to other disciplines. For example, if you are studying the Civil War in social studies, perhaps they could look up historical fiction novels set during the Civil War era or research medical advancements from the time period for science.

38. Have a question conversation

Start with a general question and students must answer your question with a question of their own. Keep the conversation going.

39. Display a picture for 30 seconds, then take it down

Have students list everything they can remember. This helps students train their memories and increases their ability to notice details.

40. Brainstorm, free-write

Brainstorming and freewriting are critical thinking strategies to get ideas on paper. In brainstorming, anything goes, no matter how off-the-wall. These are great tools to get ideas flowing that can then be used to inform research.

41. Step outside your comfort zone

Direct students to learn about a topic they have no interest in or find particularly challenging. In this case, their perseverance is being developed as they do something that is difficult for them.

42. The answer is, the question might be

This is another bell-ringer game that’s great for engaging those brains. You give students the answer and they come up with what the question might be.

43. Cooperative learning

Group work is a critical thinking staple because it teaches students that there is no one right way to approach a problem and that other opinions are equally valid.

44. What? So what? Now what?

After concluding a unit of study, these three question frames can be used to help students contextualize their learning.

45. Reflection

Ask students to reflect on their work – specifically, how they can improve moving forward.

46. Classify and categorize

These are higher level Bloom’s tasks for a reason. Categorizing requires students to think about like traits and rank them in order of importance.

47. Role play

Roleplay allows students to practice creative thinking strategies. Here, students assume a role and act accordingly.

48. Set goals

Have students set concrete, measurable goals in your class so they understand why what they do matters.

No matter your subject area, encourage students to read voraciously. Through reading they will be exposed to new ideas, new perspectives, and their worlds will grow.

50. Cultivate curiosity

A curious mind is an engaged mind. Students should be encouraged to perform inquiry simply for the sake that it is a joy to learn about something we care about.

TREAT YO' INBOX!

All the trending teacher stories, resources, videos, memes, podcasts, deals, and the laughter you need in your life!

A Deep Dive into 10 Thought-Provoking Critical Thinking Exercises

Today, information bombards us from all directions, and the ability to think critically has become a paramount skill. Beyond the rote memorization of facts, critical thinking exercises involve the analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of information to make informed decisions. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore ten engaging and effective critical thinking exercises designed to enhance cognitive abilities, foster intellectual agility, and contribute to overall cognitive excellence.

List of Critical Thinking Exercises: 

1. socratic questioning: unlocking wisdom through dialogue.

The Socratic method, with its roots in ancient philosophy, serves as a foundational exercise for critical thinking. It involves posing open-ended questions stimulating thoughtful dialogue and exploring complex topics. The exercise encourages individuals to engage in structured discussions, challenging assumptions, and dissecting various perspectives on a chosen subject matter.

Exercise: Organize or participate in Socratic discussion groups where participants tackle topics ranging from ethical dilemmas to societal issues. The goal is to foster an environment where thoughtful questioning leads to a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

2. Brain Teasers and Puzzles: Nurturing Analytical Thinking

Solving puzzles, riddles, and brain teasers is a classic exercise for enhancing problem-solving skills and developing cognitive flexibility. Engaging in these activities challenges the mind, fostering creativity and adaptability.

Exercise: Dedicate regular time to solving Sudoku, crosswords, or logic puzzles. These exercises provide mental stimulation and improve memory, concentration, and logical reasoning.

3. Debate Club Participation: Sharpening Persuasive and Analytical Skills

Joining a debate club provides a platform to practice constructing persuasive arguments, critically evaluating opposing viewpoints, and refining communication skills. The exercise encourages individuals to think on their feet, respond to counterarguments, and strengthen their ability to convey ideas convincingly.

Exercise: Actively participate in structured debates on topics ranging from current affairs to philosophical dilemmas. This fosters the development of not only critical thinking but also effective communication.

4. Case Study Analysis: Applying Critical Thinking to Real-World Scenarios

Analyzing real or hypothetical case studies allows individuals to apply critical thinking exercises to assess situations and propose effective solutions. This exercise mimics the problem-solving demands of various professions and prepares individuals to think critically in real-world contexts.

Exercise: Review business case studies, legal scenarios, or medical cases, identifying key issues and recommending strategic approaches. This hands-on approach enhances decision-making skills.

5. Concept Mapping: Visualizing Complex Ideas for Better Understanding

Creating visual representations of ideas, relationships, and hierarchies through concept mapping enhances understanding and promotes analytical thinking. This exercise encourages individuals to see the interconnectedness of concepts and improves visual-spatial thinking.

Exercise: Utilize mind maps or concept maps to illustrate complex concepts or plan projects. This visual approach aids in organizing thoughts, identifying relationships between ideas, and enhancing overall comprehension.

6. Decision-Making Simulations: Learning Through Virtual Scenarios

Participation in decision-making simulations replicates real-world scenarios, encouraging thoughtful analysis and strategic thinking. This exercise allows individuals to make decisions within a controlled environment, experiencing the consequences of their choices.

Exercise: Explore online simulations or business strategy games that require strategic decision-making. These simulations provide a risk-free environment for learning and testing different decision-making approaches.

7. Read Diverse Perspectives: Broadening Horizons through Literature

Exposure to a variety of perspectives, cultures, and ideologies through literature and diverse media broadens understanding and encourages critical thinking. This exercise prompts individuals to consider alternative viewpoints and challenges preconceived notions.

Exercise: Read books, and articles, or watch documentaries from authors with differing viewpoints. This exposure to diverse perspectives fosters empathy, cultural awareness, and a more nuanced understanding of the world.

8. Critical Writing Exercises: Articulating Coherent Arguments

Developing analytical writing skills involves articulating coherent arguments and supporting them with evidence, fostering clarity and logical reasoning. This exercise enhances the ability to express complex thoughts in a structured and persuasive manner.

Exercise: Engage in writing essays or analyses on thought-provoking topics. Focus on constructing compelling arguments with evidence-based reasoning. This exercise not only hones critical thinking exercises but also improves written communication.

9. Ethical Dilemma Deliberation: Exploring Morality and Decision-Making

Delving into ethical dilemmas requires individuals to examine the moral implications of decisions, considering multiple ethical frameworks. This exercise encourages individuals to think critically about the consequences of their actions on both a personal and societal level.

Exercise: Engage in discussions and analyze ethical scenarios, exploring the ethical dimensions of various decisions. This exercise prompts individuals to consider the broader implications of their choices.

10. Data Analysis Challenges: Making Informed Decisions Based on Data

Enhancing quantitative critical thinking involves interpreting and drawing conclusions from data, promoting data literacy. This exercise empowers individuals to make informed decisions based on quantitative information.

Exercise: Work with datasets, analyze trends, and draw meaningful insights. Developing proficiency in data analysis enhances the ability to make evidence-based decisions in various contexts.

Conclusion:

Cultivating cognitive excellence through critical thinking exercises is a journey that requires active engagement in diverse exercises. The ten exercises presented in this guide offer a comprehensive range of activities to foster cognitive agility. From engaging in Socratic questioning to tackling ethical dilemmas and analyzing data, these exercises empower individuals to approach challenges with a discerning and analytical mindset. Embrace the journey of continuous intellectual development through these practical and stimulating critical thinking exercises, and witness the transformative power of a sharpened mind.

Also Read: 10 Team-Building Games That Promote Critical Thinking

Most popular stories.

Minnesota Officials Subpoenaed in Feeding Our Future Fraud Investigation

Source-timesnownews.com Federal Committee Demands Accountability (WASHINGTON, DC) – Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Education Commissioner Willie Jett, alongside high-ranking officials

Education’s Critical Role in Combating Climate Change

Source-blogs.worldbank.org Education: A Key Driver for Combating Climate Change Education plays a vital role in addressing the climate crisis, reshaping

Arizona Students Share Big Dreams as State Treasurer Kimberly Yee Launches College Savings Essay Contest

Kicking Off College Savings Month with Student Aspirations September marks the start of College Savings Month in Arizona. State Treasurer

Arizona High Schools Expand Career and Technical Education with New Robotics Program

Arizona's Growing Demand for Career and Technical Education Programs As industries in Arizona increasingly seek skilled professionals, the demand for

How Early Childhood Education Prepares Kids for Lifelong Achievement?

Early Childhood Education (ECE) is known as nursery education. ECE plays an important role for young children, from birth to

Vermont’s Public Education Faces Enrollment Decline and Staffing Challenges

Source - mynbc5.com Enrollment Decline and Academic Performance Issues The Vermont Agency of Education's recent report, stemming from its "listen

Trump Pledges Historic Cuts to Education Department in Potential Second Term

Source - lawcoachbc.ca As students return to classrooms this fall, the focus shifts to the upcoming presidential election and the

CityUHK Unveils New College of Computing to Shape Future Innovation

Source - asiaeducationreview.com Pioneering Future-Ready Education City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK) has announced the establishment of its new College

Join Our Newsletter!

Get the latest education updates delivered to your inbox.

Future Education Magazine is an exceptional source of knowledge and resources for those looking to choose the right path in education. Whether you are a student, parent, educator, or education enthusiast, our magazine is committed to providing you with insightful and valuable content.

• Higher Education
• Professional Courses
• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions
• [email protected]
• +1 (408) 520-9503
• 3277 S White Rd #41 San Jose, CA 95148, United States

Copyright © 2024: Future Education Magazine | All rights reserved.

Want a daily email of lesson plans that span all subjects and age groups?

Subjects all subjects all subjects the arts all the arts visual arts performing arts value of the arts back business & economics all business & economics global economics macroeconomics microeconomics personal finance business back design, engineering & technology all design, engineering & technology design engineering technology back health all health growth & development medical conditions consumer health public health nutrition physical fitness emotional health sex education back literature & language all literature & language literature linguistics writing/composition speaking back mathematics all mathematics algebra data analysis & probability geometry measurement numbers & operations back philosophy & religion all philosophy & religion philosophy religion back psychology all psychology history, approaches and methods biological bases of behavior consciousness, sensation and perception cognition and learning motivation and emotion developmental psychology personality psychological disorders and treatment social psychology back science & technology all science & technology earth and space science life sciences physical science environmental science nature of science back social studies all social studies anthropology area studies civics geography history media and journalism sociology back teaching & education all teaching & education education leadership education policy structure and function of schools teaching strategies back thinking & learning all thinking & learning attention and engagement memory critical thinking problem solving creativity collaboration information literacy organization and time management back, filter by none.

• Elementary/Primary
• Middle School/Lower Secondary
• High School/Upper Secondary
• College/University
• TED-Ed Animations
• TED Talk Lessons
• TED-Ed Best of Web
• Under 3 minutes
• Under 6 minutes
• Under 9 minutes
• Under 12 minutes
• Under 18 minutes
• Over 18 minutes
• Algerian Arabic
• Azerbaijani
• Cantonese (Hong Kong)
• Chinese (Hong Kong)
• Chinese (Singapore)
• Chinese (Taiwan)
• Chinese Simplified
• Chinese Traditional
• Chinese Traditional (Taiwan)
• Dutch (Belgium)
• Dutch (Netherlands)
• French (Canada)
• French (France)
• French (Switzerland)
• Kurdish (Central)
• Luxembourgish
• Persian (Afghanistan)
• Persian (Iran)
• Portuguese (Brazil)
• Portuguese (Portugal)
• Spanish (Argentina)
• Spanish (Latin America)
• Spanish (Mexico)
• Spanish (Spain)
• Spanish (United States)
• Western Frisian

sort by none

• Longest video
• Shortest video
• Most video views
• Least video views
• Most questions answered
• Least questions answered

How could so many people support Hitler?

Lesson duration 05:10

690,283 Views

Can you solve the magical maze riddle?

Lesson duration 04:51

481,162 Views

How to make smart decisions more easily

Lesson duration 05:16

1,348,472 Views

Can you solve a mystery before Sherlock Holmes?

Lesson duration 05:17

530,656 Views

Can you solve the secret assassin society riddle?

Lesson duration 05:01

910,807 Views

How to overcome your mistakes

Lesson duration 04:52

1,043,465 Views

Can you solve the cursed dice riddle?

Lesson duration 04:31

803,508 Views

Why some people don't have an inner monologue

Lesson duration 12:03

2,915,021 Views

Science vs. Pseudoscience

Lesson duration 05:48

371,322 Views

Can you solve the time traveling car riddle?

Lesson duration 05:18

700,907 Views

This one weird trick will get you infinite gold

Lesson duration 05:08

1,173,809 Views

How to quit your job — without ruining your career - Gala Jackson

Lesson duration 06:13

117,145 Views

What if you experienced every human life in history?

Lesson duration 05:21

3,004,909 Views

How to design climate-resilient buildings - Alyssa-Amor Gibbons

Lesson duration 14:12

46,417 Views

The case for free, universal basic services - Aaron Bastani

Lesson duration 19:09

82,224 Views

Can you steal the most powerful wand in the wizarding world?

Lesson duration 05:20

835,514 Views

History vs. Thomas Jefferson

494,923 Views

The best way to apologize (according to science)

Lesson duration 05:06

1,573,146 Views

How do we determine the value of a life?

Lesson duration 06:06

821,610 Views

What’s the smartest age?

Lesson duration 04:53

1,719,732 Views

The Boltzmann brain paradox

Lesson duration 05:40

1,233,574 Views

The 4 greatest threats to the survival of humanity

Lesson duration 05:24

496,530 Views

Can you outsmart the college admissions fallacy?

Lesson duration 06:17

838,961 Views

Can you solve the fortress riddle?

Lesson duration 05:23

1,311,191 Views

• Description Generator

Child Report Generator

• Marking and Grading Assistant
• Lesson Plans
• Lesson Plan Power Points

Email & Message Reply Generator

• Story Writer

Question Generator

• Multi Choice Generator
• Long Form Question Generator
• All Articles
• Effective Feedback
• Future Classrooms
• Lesson Planning Evolution
• Collaborative Learning with AI
• Digital Literacy
• English Language
• English Literature
• Religious Studies
• Phonics and Reading
• Get Started in Seconds

Revolutionize Your Teaching with AI

Planit Teachers offers cutting-edge AI tools to supercharge your teaching productivity.

Boost Productivity

AI-Powered Planning

Use code "GETSTARTED" for 50% off your first month!

10 Fun Classroom Activities to Promote Critical Thinking

As a teacher, it's important to promote critical thinking skills in your students. Critical thinking is a valuable skill that helps students analyze information, solve problems, and make decisions. In this blog post, we'll explore 10 fun classroom activities that promote critical thinking.

Here are 10 fun classroom activities that promote critical thinking:

1. Problem-Solving Scenarios: Provide students with real-life scenarios and ask them to come up with solutions. This activity encourages students to think critically and creatively to solve problems. 2. Group Discussions: Encourage students to discuss and debate topics in groups. This activity helps students develop their communication and critical thinking skills. 3. Brainstorming: Ask students to brainstorm ideas for a project or assignment. This activity helps students develop their creativity and critical thinking skills. 4. Role-Playing: Assign students roles and ask them to act out a scenario. This activity helps students develop their empathy and critical thinking skills. 5. Analyzing Texts: Provide students with texts and ask them to analyze and interpret them. This activity helps students develop their analytical and critical thinking skills. 6. Debate: Assign students a topic and ask them to debate it. This activity helps students develop their communication and critical thinking skills. 7. Mind Mapping: Ask students to create a mind map of a topic. This activity helps students develop their organizational and critical thinking skills. 8. Creative Writing: Ask students to write a story or poem. This activity helps students develop their creativity and critical thinking skills. 9. Problem-Solving Games: Provide students with problem-solving games and ask them to solve them. This activity helps students develop their problem-solving and critical thinking skills. 10. Reflection: Ask students to reflect on their learning and identify areas for improvement. This activity helps students develop their self-awareness and critical thinking skills.

These activities are just a few examples of how you can promote critical thinking in your classroom. By incorporating these activities into your lessons, you can help your students develop their cognitive abilities and become better problem-solvers and decision-makers.

It's important to remember that critical thinking is a skill that takes time and practice to develop. By providing your students with opportunities to think critically, you can help them build this valuable skill.

In conclusion, promoting critical thinking in your classroom is essential for your students' success. By using these 10 fun classroom activities, you can engage your students and help them develop their critical thinking skills.

So, what are you waiting for? Try these activities in your classroom today and watch your students' critical thinking skills soar!

Transform Your Grading with AI Teacher Marking

Revolutionize your grading process with our advanced AI Teacher Marking tool. Our AI algorithms can efficiently grade a variety of assignments, providing detailed feedback and insights.

AI Teacher Marking doesnt just grade; it provides constructive criticism, pinpoints errors, identifies model answers, and references the mark scheme for a holistic evaluation.

By automating the grading process, AI Teacher Marking frees up valuable time for educators, allowing them to focus more on student engagement and personalized teaching.

AI Teacher Marking revolutionizes workflow efficiency for educators. The tool's capability to quickly process and grade student submissions in bulk significantly reduces the time spent on manual marking.

Beyond just grading, AI Teacher Marking offers deep analytical insights into student performance. It provides educators with detailed reports highlighting class trends, common misconceptions, and areas needing more focus.

Revolutionize Your Teaching with AI-Powered Lesson Plans

Welcome to the future of education! Planit Teachers brings you AI-powered lesson plans, tailored for any subject and age group. Just describe your topic and age group, and our advanced AI will craft a bespoke, unique lesson plan designed specifically for your needs.

Our AI-driven lesson plans are not just about convenience, they're about quality. Each plan is meticulously crafted to ensure it meets the highest educational standards. Plus, with our AI's ability to learn and adapt, your lesson plans will only get better over time.

But that's not all! With each lesson plan, you'll also receive a comprehensive list of resources to aid your teaching. And the best part? You can save your plan to your account, edit it as you see fit, and even generate a PDF for offline use or printing.

Innovative Long Form Question Generator

Transform the way you create quizzes with our state-of-the-art Long Form Question Generator. Designed for educators, this revolutionary tool crafts unlimited, expertly written questions tailored to any topic or age group, all powered by advanced AI.

Experience the freedom to customize your quizzes to align perfectly with your educational goals. Our generator allows for unparalleled customization of topics, difficulty levels, and more, enabling you to craft the perfect questions for your students in mere minutes.

Elevate your teaching and engage your students like never before. Save time, enhance learning, and ensure your quizzes are always fresh and relevant. Our Long Form Question Generator is your ultimate partner in creating dynamic, impactful educational content.

End of term reports are a time consuming and stressful task for any teacher. We've built a tool to help you save time and effort when writing reports. Simply describe the child and we'll generate a report for you. You can then edit the report to make it perfect and download it as a PDF. Your report can be tailored using tone, length and complexity settings.

Get back control of your free time using our Child Report Generator. Instant report generation for any child. Happy, angry, concerned and comedic reports generated instantly to your exact specifications.

Crafting quizzes and question sheets for your class is a problem of the past with our Question Generator. Simply describe the topic and age group and we'll do the rest, crafting you a bespoke and totally unique set of questions built exactly for your needs.

With your new quiz, you'll also get a list of resources to help as well as the ability to save your quiz to your account and edit it later. You can then generate a PDF from your quiz, download it for offline use and print for your class.

Get back control of your free time using our Question Generator. Instant quiz and question generation for any topic and age group.

Subject Description Generator

When teaching English, Teachers often need to spend time crafting complex subject, landscape, setting and character descriptions. With our Subject Description Generator, you can instantly generate a description for any subject, landscape, setting or character. Simply describe the subject, landscape, setting or character and we'll do the rest, crafting you a bespoke and totally unique description built exactly for your needs.

We even tailor the description to your exact specifications, allowing you to choose the length, complexity and tone of the description. We then craft the wording to perfectly match your age group and child level.

Multiple Choice Question Generator

Say goodbye to the hassle of creating quizzes manually. Our innovative Multiple Choice Question Generator empowers teachers to generate unlimited questions with 4 multiple choice answers on any topic for any age group, all powered by AI.

Tailor your quizzes to perfectly match your teaching needs. With the ability to customize topics, difficulty levels, and more, you can create the ideal quiz for your class in minutes. Plus, save your quizzes for future use, edit them as needed, and even generate PDFs for easy sharing and printing.

Reclaim your free time and enhance your teaching with quizzes that engage and challenge your students. Our Multiple Choice Question Generator is the ultimate tool for instant, hassle-free quiz creation for any subject and age group.

AI-powered instant replies for emails and messages. Everyone knows that teachers already have enough on their plate, so we've built a tool to help you save time and effort when replying to emails and messages from parents, students and colleagues. Simply describe the topic of the email and we'll generate a reply for you. You can then edit the reply to make it perfect and send it off. If it totally misses the mark, you can instantly regenerate a new reply and try again.

Get back control of your free time using our Email, Message, Class Dojo Reply Generator. Instant message generation for any usage.

Related Articles

• The Maker Movement in Education: Fostering Creativity and Innovation
• The Power of Project-Based Learning: Inspiring Creativity and Critical Thinking in Education
• The Teacher as a Cognitive Coach: Nurturing Metacognition in the Classroom
• The Neuroscience of Creativity: Fostering Innovation in Education | Planit Teachers
• Empowering Students Through Project-Based Learning
• The Power of Play: Incorporating Play-Based Learning in the Classroom
• The Impact of Outdoor Education: Fostering Exploration and Environmental Awareness
• The Magic of Mind Mapping: Boosting Creativity and Critical Thinking in Students
• The Power of Peer Collaboration: Fostering Student Engagement
• The Benefits of Project-Based Learning: Engaging Students Through Real-World Experiences
• The Art of Reflection: Fostering Metacognitive Skills in Students
• AI and Creativity: Fostering Innovation and Critical Thinking in the Classroom
• AI and Student Engagement: Enhancing Learning Motivation with Interactive Technology
• The Art of AI-Powered Creativity: Inspiring Innovation and Critical Thinking in Students
• The Benefits of Project-Based Learning: Engaging Students Through Real-World Applications
• Fostering Creativity in the Classroom: Strategies for Inspiring Student Innovation
• The Role of Play in Learning: Enhancing Creativity and Imagination in the Classroom
• Promoting Creativity and Innovation in the Classroom - Inspiring Student Growth
• The Benefits of Project-Based Learning for Student Success
• Cultivating 21st Century Skills in Students: Preparing for the Future

Fun Critical Thinking Activities

Learning to evaluate information, find credible sources, and prepare for counterarguments is an important skill for people to learn, especially in the modern age of information. Here are 10 great critical thinking activities designed to develop your critical thinking skills.

  With so much information on the internet, parsing through what’s true and what isn’t can be a difficult challenge that relies heavily on your ability to think critically . The rest of this article will discuss 10 fun activities to improve your critical thinking skills.

Worst Case Scenario

In this first scenario, you’ll want a group of friends to bounce ideas around. The premise works by assuming that you and a group of friends are in a worst-case scenario. This might be the classic stranded on a desert island trope, but you can also change it up with something like being trapped in a spaceship with hostile aliens aboard.

In this exercise, you’ll be required to think both creatively and critically to evaluate what your best course of action is, how to allocate resources, and who should take on what roles and responsibilities.

Creative Construction

This exercise works your critical thinking muscles by forcing you to evaluate the resources you have on hand, what you can build out of them, and how you’re going to go about constructing it with the tools you have.

Story Telling

A very popular game that’s still worth its salt for adults, this activity starts with a series of random images. You can pull these straight from pictures on a browser and put them into a slideshow. Get a group together for your favorite storytime.

Not only does this create some hilarious stories, but it allows you to develop your critical thinking skills by evaluating how the image you’re given and the story might pair up.

Pragmatic Problem Solving

Where applicable, you can convert this idea into action by sharing your plan with public officials or starting a petition to inspire the change you want to see. Considering how different perspectives and resources play into this quandary is a powerful thought exercise that can help you develop your critical thinking skills.

Critical Analysis

Another great and dead simple exercise to develop your critical thinking skills is analyzing a popular piece of literature. Read it carefully and evaluate the author’s opinion, the biases behind them, and how you would either agree or contradict their viewpoints.

Controversy Conundrum

Not only do you have to present and uphold your viewpoint, but you’ll be obligated to address and respond to opposing viewpoints. To make this a twist, consider which side you’d take in the question and force yourself (and all participants) to defend their opponents’ points of view.

Alien Vacation

An entertaining premise puts you in the role of a tour guide for an alien on vacation. Evaluate something you take for granted, like a baseball game, and try to explain every aspect about it in a way that an alien would be able to comprehend. To add some humor, take turns on this exercise and have a friend play the alien to ask those probing questions.

Prison Promises

Competitor compromises.

Not only is this exercise good for developing critical thinking , but it’s a good way to think about your business. Consider your greatest business rival and assess how you could help them succeed further in their business without detrimentally affecting your own.

Final Thoughts on Fun Critical Thinking Activities

There are lots of great critical thinking exercises you can partake in, whether you want to get a group of friends together or just sit down with a pen and a pencil. Developing these skills is a dynamic and valuable way of improving your ability to solve problems.

You may also like

The connection between associative thinking and entrepreneurship: exploring the link, divergent vs convergent thinking – what are they and how are they different, the psychology behind critical thinking: understanding the mental processes involved, critical thinking questions for your boyfriend, download this free ebook.

Critical Thinking Exercises

• Writing Research Papers
• Writing Essays
• English Grammar
• M.Ed., Education Administration, University of Georgia
• B.A., History, Armstrong State University

Critical thinking is a skill that students develop gradually as they progress in school. While the skill becomes more important in higher grades, some students find it difficult to understand the concept of critical thinking .

The reason critical thinking can be difficult to grasp is because it requires students to set aside assumptions and beliefs to learn to think without bias or judgment.

Critical thinking involves suspending your beliefs to explore and question topics from a "blank page" point of view. It also involves the ability to distinguish fact from opinion when exploring a topic.

These exercises are designed to help develop critical thinking skills.

Critical Thinking Exercise 1: Tour Guide for an Alien

This exercise provides an opportunity to think outside your normal way of thinking.

Pretend that you have been assigned the task of conducting a tour for aliens who are visiting the earth and observing human life. You're riding along in a blimp, viewing the landscape below, and you float over a professional baseball stadium. One of the aliens looks down and is very confused by what he sees. You explain that there is a game going on and he asks several important questions.

• What is a game? 
• Why are there no female players?
• Why do people get so excited about watching other people play games?
• What is a team?
• Why can't the people in the seats go down on the field and join in?

If you try to answer these questions fully, it will quickly become apparent that we carry around certain assumptions and values. We support a certain team, for instance, because it makes us feel like we're a part of a community. This sense of community is a value that matters to some people more than others.

Furthermore, when trying to explain team sports to an alien, you have to explain the value we place on winning and losing.

When you think like an alien tour guide, you are forced to take a deeper look at the things we do and things we value. Sometimes they don't sound logical from the outside looking in.

Critical Thinking Exercise 2: Fact or Opinion

Do you think you know the difference between fact and opinion? It's not always easy to discern. When you visit websites, do you believe everything you read? The abundance of available information makes it more important than ever for students to develop critical thinking skills. Additionally, it's an important reminder that you must use trustworthy sources in your school work.

If you don't learn the difference between fact and opinion, you may end up reading and watching things that continue to reinforce beliefs and assumptions you already own.

For this exercise, read each statement and try to determine whether it sounds like a fact or an opinion. This can be completed alone or with a study partner .

• My mom is the best mom on earth.
• My dad is taller than your dad.
• My telephone number is difficult to memorize.
• The deepest part of the ocean is 35,813 feet deep.
• Dogs make better pets than turtles.
• Smoking is bad for your health.
• Eighty-five percent of all cases of lung cancer in the U.S. are caused by smoking.
• If you flatten and stretch out a Slinky toy it will be 87 feet long.
• Slinky toys are fun.
• One out of every one hundred American citizens is color blind.
• Two out of ten American citizens are boring.

You will probably find some of the statements easy to judge but other statements difficult. If you can effectively debate the truthfulness of a statement with your partner, then it's most likely an opinion.

• Research Note Cards
• How Can You Stretch a Paper to Make it Longer?
• The Introductory Paragraph: Start Your Paper Off Right
• Understanding the Progressive Era
• What Is a Senior Thesis?
• How to Write a News Article That's Effective
• How Long Should My Paper Be?
• When to Cite a Source in a Paper
• Tips for Typing an Academic Paper on a Computer
• How to Narrow the Research Topic for Your Paper
• Unreliable Sources for Your Research Project
• Creating a Table of Contents
• Finding Sources for Death Penalty Research
• How to Write a 10-Page Research Paper
• What Is an Autobiography?
• Your Personal Essay Thesis Sentence

• Grades 6-12
• School Leaders

Have you entered to win this adorable math giveaway? ✨

100+ Critical Thinking Questions for Students To Ask About Anything

Critical thinkers question everything.

In an age of “fake news” claims and constant argument about pretty much any issue, critical thinking skills are key. Teach your students that it’s vital to ask questions about everything, but that it’s also important to ask the right sorts of questions. Students can use these critical thinking questions with fiction or nonfiction texts. They’re also useful when discussing important issues or trying to understand others’ motivations in general.

“Who” Critical Thinking Questions

Questions like these help students ponder who’s involved in a story and how the actions affect them. They’ll also consider who’s telling the tale and how reliable that narrator might be.

• Is the protagonist?
• Is the antagonist?
• Caused harm?
• Is harmed as a result?
• Was the most important character?

• Is responsible?
• Is most directly affected?
• Should have won?
• Will benefit?
• Would be affected by this?

• Makes the decisions?

“What” Critical Thinking Questions

Ask questions that explore issues more deeply, including those that might not be directly answered in the text.

• Background information do I know or need to know?
• Is the main message?
• Are the defining characteristics?

• Questions or concerns do I have?
• Don’t I understand?
• Evidence supports the author’s conclusion?
• Would it be like if … ?
• Could happen if … ?
• Other outcomes might have happened?
• Questions would you have asked?
• Would you ask the author about … ?
• Was the point of … ?
• Should have happened instead?
• Is that character’s motive?
• Else could have changed the whole story?

• Can you conclude?
• Would your position have been in that situation?
• Would happen if … ?
• Makes your position stronger?
• Was the turning point?
• Is the point of the question?
• Did it mean when … ?
• Is the other side of this argument?
• Was the purpose of … ?
• Does ______ mean?
• Is the problem you are trying to solve?
• Does the evidence say?
• Assumptions are you making?
• Is a better alternative?
• Are the strengths of the argument?

• Are the weaknesses of the argument?
• Is the difference between _______ and _______?

“Where” Critical Thinking Questions

Think about where the story is set and how it affects the actions. Plus, consider where and how you can learn more.

• Would this issue be a major problem?
• Are areas for improvement?
• Did the story change?
• Would you most often find this problem?

• Are there similar situations?
• Would you go to get answers to this problem?
• Can this be improved?
• Can you get more information?
• Will this idea take us?

“When” Critical Thinking Questions

Think about timing and the effect it has on the characters or people involved.

• Is this acceptable?
• Is this unacceptable?

• Does this become a problem?
• Is the best time to take action?
• Will we be able to tell if it worked?
• Is it time to reassess?
• Should we ask for help?
• Is the best time to start?
• Is it time to stop?
• Would this benefit society?

• Has this happened before?

“Why” Critical Thinking Questions

Asking “why” might be one of the most important parts of critical thinking. Exploring and understanding motivation helps develop empathy and make sense of difficult situations.

• Is _________ happening?
• Have we allowed this to happen?
• Should people care about this issue?

• Is this a problem?
• Did the character say … ?
• Did the character do … ?
• Is this relevant?
• Did the author write this?
• Did the author decide to … ?
• Is this important?

• Did that happen?
• Is it necessary?
• Do you think I (he, she, they) asked that question?
• Is that answer the best one?
• Do we need this today?

“How” Critical Thinking Questions

Use these questions to consider how things happen and whether change is possible.

• Do we know this is true?
• Does the language used affect the story?
• Would you solve … ?
• Is this different from other situations?

• Is this similar to … ?
• Would you use … ?
• Does the location affect the story?
• Could the story have ended differently?
• Does this work?
• Could this be harmful?
• Does this connect with what I already know?
• Else could this have been handled?
• Should they have responded?

• Would you feel about … ?
• Does this change the outcome?
• Did you make that decision?
• Does this benefit you/others?
• Does this hurt you/others?
• Could this problem be avoided?

More Critical Thinking Questions

Here are more questions to help probe further and deepen understanding.

• Can you give me an example?

• Do you agree with … ?
• Can you compare this with … ?
• Can you defend the actions of … ?
• Could this be interpreted differently?
• Is the narrator reliable?
• Does it seem too good to be true?

• Is ______ a fact or an opinion?

What are your favorite critical thinking questions? Come exchange ideas on the WeAreTeachers HELPLINE group on Facebook .

Plus, check out 10 tips for teaching kids to be awesome critical thinkers ., you might also like.

5 Critical Thinking Skills Every Kid Needs To Learn (And How To Teach Them)

Teach them to thoughtfully question the world around them. Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. 5335 Gate Parkway, Jacksonville, FL 32256

25 Critical Thinking Examples

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

Critical thinking is the ability to analyze information and make reasoned decisions. It involves suspended judgment, open-mindedness, and clarity of thought.

It involves considering different viewpoints and weighing evidence carefully. It is essential for solving complex problems and making good decisions.

People who think critically are able to see the world in a more nuanced way and understand the interconnectedness of things. They are also better able to adapt to change and handle uncertainty.

In today’s fast-paced world, the ability to think critically is more important than ever and necessary for students and employees alike.

Critical Thinking Examples

1. identifying strengths and weaknesses.

Critical thinkers don’t just take things at face value. They stand back and contemplate the potential strengths and weaknesses of something and then make a decision after contemplation.

This helps you to avoid excessive bias and identify possible problems ahead of time.

For example, a boxer about to get in the ring will likely need to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of his opponent. He might learn that his opponent’s left hook is very strong, but his opponent also gets tired after the third round. With this knowledge, he can go into the bout with strong defenses in the first three rounds before going on the offense.

Here, the boxer’s critical thinking skills will help him win his match.

2. Creating a Hypothesis based on Limited Data

When scientists set out to test a new theory, they first need to develop a hypothesis. This is an educated guess about how things work, based on what is already known.

Once a hypothesis has been developed, experiments can be designed to test it.

However, sometimes scientists may find themselves working with limited data. In such cases, they may need to make some assumptions in order to form a hypothesis.

For example, if they are studying a phenomenon that occurs infrequently, they may need to extrapolate from the data they do have in order to form a hypothesis.

Here, the scientist is engaged in critical thinking: they use the limited data to come up with a tentative judgment.

3. Moderating a Debate

A debate moderator needs to have strong critical thinking skills. They need to use objective evaluations, analysis, and critique to keep the discussion on track and ensure that all sides are heard fairly.

This means being able to identify when a point has been made sufficiently, or when someone is beginning to veer off topic and being able to direct the conversation accordingly.

Similarly, they need to be able to assess each argument objectively and consider its merits, rather than getting caught up in the emotion of the debate. If someone is using an unfair point or one that is not factual, the moderator needs to be switched on and identify this.

By remaining calm and impartial, the moderator can help to ensure that a debate is productive and respectful.

4. Judging and Adjudicating

A judge or adjudicator needs to weigh the evidence and make a determination based on the facts.

This requires the adjudicator to be able to try to see both sides of an argument. They need the ability to see past personal biases and to critically evaluate the credibility of all sides.

In addition, judges and adjudicators must be able to think quickly and make sound decisions in the face of complex issues.

For example, if you were to be adjudicating the above debate, you need to hear both sides of the argument and then decide who won. It’s your job to evaluate, see strengths and weaknesses in arguments, and come to a conclusion.

5. Grading an Essay

Teachers need critical thinking skills when grading essays so that they can effectively assess the quality of the writing. By critically analyzing the essay, teachers can identify any errors or weaknesses in the argument.

Furthermore, they can also determine whether the essay meets the required standards for the assignment. Even a very well-written essay may deserve a lower grade if the essay doesn’t directly answer the essay question.

A teacher needs to be able to read an essay and understand not only what the student is trying to say, but also how well they are making their argument. Are they using evidence effectively? Are they drawing valid conclusions? A teacher needs to be able to evaluate an essay holistically in order to give a fair grade.

In order to properly evaluate an essay, teachers need to be able to think critically about the writing. Only then can they provide an accurate assessment of the work.

6. Active Reading

Active reading is a skill that requires the reader to be engaged with the text in order to fully understand it. This means not only being able to read the words on the page, but also being able to interpret the meaning behind them.

In order to do this, active readers need to have good critical thinking skills.

They need to be able to ask questions about the text and look for evidence to support their answers. Additionally, active readers need to be able to make connections between the text and their own experiences.

Active reading leads to better comprehension and retention of information.

7. Deciding Whether or Not to Believe Something

When trying to determine whether or not to believe something, you’re engaging in critical thinking.

For example, you might need to consider the source of the information. If the information comes from a reliable source, such as a reputable news organization or a trusted friend, then it is more likely to be accurate.

However, if the source is less reliable, such as an anonymous website or a person with a known bias, then the information should be viewed with more skepticism.

In addition, it is important to consider the evidence that is being presented. If the evidence is well-supported and logically presented, then it is more likely to be true. However, if the evidence is weak or relies on fallacious reasoning, then the claim is less likely to be true.

8. Determining the Best Solution to a Situation

Determining the best solution to a problem generally requires you to critique the different options. There are often many different factors to consider, and it can be difficult to know where to start.

However, there are some general guidelines that can help to make the process a little easier.

For example, if you have a few possible solutions to the problem, it is important to weigh the pros and cons of each one. Consider both the short-term and long-term effects of each option before making a decision.

Furthermore, it is important to be aware of your own biases. Be sure to consider all of the options objectively, without letting your personal preferences get in the way.

9. Giving Formative Feedback

Formative feedback is feedback that you give to someone part-way through a learning experience. To do this, you need to think critically.

For example, one thing you need to do is see where the student’s strengths and weaknesses like. Perhaps the student is doing extremely well at a task, so your feedback might be that they should try to extend themselves by adding more complexity to the task.

Or, perhaps the student is struggling, so you suggest to them that they approach the learning experience from a different angle.

10. Giving Summative Feedback

Summative feedback occurs at the end of a learning scenario. For example, the written feedback at the end of an essay or on a report card is summative.

When providing summative feedback, it is important to take a step back and consider the situation from multiple perspectives. What are areas for improvement and where exactly might the student have missed some key points? How could the student have done better?

Asking yourself these questions is all part of the process of giving feedback, and they can all be considered examples of critical thinking. You’re literally critiquing the student’s work and identifying opportunities for improvement.

11. Evaluating Evidence

When evaluating evidence, critical thinkers take a step back and look at the bigger picture. They consider all of the available information and weigh it up. They look at logical flaws, the reliability of the evidence, and its validity.

This process allows them to arrive at a conclusion that is based on sound reasoning, rather than emotion or personal bias.

For example, when a social scientist looks at the evidence from his study, he needs to evaluate whether the data was corrupted and ensure the methodology was sound in order to determine if the evidence is valuable or not.

12. Media Literacy

Media literacy seems to be in short supply these days. Too many people take information off the internet or television and just assume it is true.

A person with media literacy, however, will not just trust what they see and read. Instead, they look at the data and weigh up the evidence. They will see if there was a sound study to back up claims. They will see if there is bias in the media source and whether it’s just following an ideological line.

Furthermore, they will make sure they seek out trustworthy media sources. These are not just media sources you like or that confirm your own point of view. They need to be sources that do their own research, find solid data, and don’t pursue one blind agenda.

13. Asking your Own Questions

Asking your own questions is an important part of critical thinking. When you ask questions, you are forcing yourself to think more deeply about the information you are considering.

Asking questions also allows you to gather more information from others who may have different perspectives.

This helps you to better understand the issue and to come up with your own conclusions.

So, often at schools, we give students a list of questions to ask about something in order to dig deeper into it. For example, in a book review lesson, the teacher might give a list of questions to ask about the book’s characters and plot.

14. Conducting Rigorous Research

Research is a process of inquiry that encompasses the gathering of data, interpretation of findings, and communication of results. The researcher needs to engage in critical thinking throughout the process, but most importantly, when designing their methodology.

Research can be done through a variety of methods, such as experiments, surveys, interviews, and observations. Each method has strengths and weaknesses.

Once the data has been collected, it must be analyzed and interpreted. This is often done through statistical methods or qualitative analysis.

Research is an essential tool for discovering new knowledge and for solving problems, but researchers need to think critically about how valid and reliable their data truly is.

15. Examining your own Beliefs and Prejudices

It’s important to examine your own beliefs and prejudices in order to ensure that they are fair and accurate. People who don’t examine their own beliefs have not truly critically examined their lives.

One way to do this is to take the time to consider why you believe what you do. What experiences have you had that have led you to this belief? Are there other ways to interpret these experiences? It’s also important to be aware of the potential for confirmation bias , which is when we seek out information that confirms our existing beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts them.

This can lead us to hold onto inaccurate or unfair beliefs even when presented with evidence to the contrary.

To avoid this, it’s important to seek out diverse perspectives, and to be open-minded when considering new information. By taking these steps, you can help ensure that your beliefs are fair and accurate.

16. Looking at a Situation from Multiple Perspectives

One of the most important critical thinking skills that you can learn in life is how to look at a situation from multiple perspectives.

Being able to see things from different angles can help you to understand complex issues, spot potential problems, and find creative solutions. It can also help you to build better relationships, as you will be able to see where others are coming from and find common ground.

There are a few simple techniques that you can use to develop this skill.

First, try to imagine how someone else would feel in the same situation.

Second, put yourself in their shoes and try to see things from their point of view.

Finally, ask yourself what other factors may be influencing their perspective. By taking the time to view things from multiple angles, you will be better prepared to deal with whatever life throws your way.

17. Considering Implications before Taking Action

When faced with a difficult decision, it is important to consider the implications of each possible action before settling on a course of action.

This is because the consequences of our actions can be far-reaching and often unforeseen.

For example, a seemingly small decision like whether to attend a party or not might have much larger implications. If we decide to go to the party, we might miss an important deadline at work.

However, if we stay home, we might miss out on an opportunity to meet new people and make valuable connections.

In either case, our choice can have a significant impact on our lives.

Fortunately, critical thinking can help people to make well-informed decisions that could have a positive impact on their lives.

For example, you might have to weight up the pros and cons of attending the party and identify potential downsides, like whether you might be in a car with an impaired driver, and whether the party is really worth losing your job.

Having weighed up the potential outcomes, you can make a more rational and informed decision.

18. Reflective Practice

Reflecting on your actions is an important part of critical thinking. When you take the time to reflect, you are able to step back and examine your choices and their consequences more objectively.

This allows you to learn from your mistakes and make better decisions in the future.

In order to reflect effectively, it is important to be honest with yourself and open to learning new things. You must also be willing to question your own beliefs and assumptions. By taking these steps, you can develop the critical thinking skills that are essential for making sound decisions next time.

This will also, fortunately, help you to constantly improve upon yourself.

19. Problem-Solving

Problem-solving requires the ability to think critically in order to accurately assess a situation and determine the best course of action.

This means being able to identify the root cause of a problem , as well as any potential obstacles that may stand in the way of a solution. It also involves breaking down a problem into smaller, more manageable pieces in order to more easily find a workable solution.

In addition, critical thinking skills also require the ability to think creatively in order to come up with original solutions to these problems.

Go Deeper: Problem-Solving Examples

20. Brainstorming New Solutions

When brainstorming new solutions , critical thinking skills are essential in order to generate fresh ideas and identify potential issues.

For example, the ability to identify the problems with the last solution you tried is important in order to come up with better solutions this time. Similarly, analytical thinking is necessary in order to evaluate the feasibility of each idea. Furthermore, it is also necessary to consider different perspectives and adapt to changing circumstances.

By utilizing all of these critical thinking skills, it will be possible to develop innovative solutions that are both practical and effective.

21. Reserving Judgment

A key part of critical thinking is reserving judgment. This means that we should not rush to conclusions, but instead take the time to consider all the evidence before making up our minds.

By reserving judgment, we can avoid making premature decisions that we might later regret. We can also avoid falling victim to confirmation bias, which is the tendency to only pay attention to information that supports our existing beliefs.

Instead, by keeping an open mind and considering all the evidence, we can make better decisions and reach more accurate conclusions.

22. Identifying Deceit

Critical thinking is an important skill to have in any situation, but it is especially important when trying to identify deceit.

There are a few key things to look for when using critical thinking to identify deceit.

First, pay attention to the person’s body language. Second, listen closely to what the person is saying and look for any inconsistencies. Finally, try to get a sense of the person’s motive – why would they want to deceive you?

Each of these questions helps you to not just take things at their face value. Instead, you’re critiquing the situation and coming to a conclusion using all of your intellect and senses, rather than just believing what you’re told.

23. Being Open-Minded to New Evidence that Contradicts your Beliefs

People with critical thinking skills are more open-minded because they are willing to consider different points of view and evidence.

They also realize that their own beliefs may be wrong and are willing to change their minds if new information is presented.

Similarly, people who are not critical thinkers tend to be close-minded because they fail to critique themselves and challenge their own mindset. This can lead to conflicts, as closed-minded people are not willing to budge on their beliefs even when presented with contradictory evidence.

Critical thinkers, on the other hand, are able to have more productive conversations as they are willing to listen to others and consider different viewpoints. Ultimately, being open-minded and willing to change one’s mind is a sign of intelligence and maturity.

24. Accounting for Bias

We all have biases, based on our individual experiences, perspectives, and beliefs. These can lead us to see the world in a certain way and to interpret information in a way that supports our existing views.

However, if we want to truly understand an issue, it is important to try to put aside our personal biases and look at the evidence objectively.

This is where critical thinking skills come in.

By using critical thinking, we can examine the evidence dispassionately and assess different arguments without letting our own prejudices get in the way. Start by looking at weaknesses and logical flaws in your own thinking.

Play the devil’s advocate.

In this way, you can start to get a more accurate picture of an issue and make more informed decisions.

25. Basing your Beliefs on Logic and Reasoning

In order to lead a successful and fulfilling life, it is important to base your beliefs on logic and reasoning.

This does not mean that you should never believe in something without evidence, but it does mean that you should be thoughtful and intentional about the things that you choose to believe.

One way to ensure that your beliefs are based on logic and reasoning is to seek out reliable sources of information. Another method is to use thought games to follow all your thoughts to their logical conclusions.

By basing your beliefs on logic and reasoning, you will be more likely to make sound decisions, and less likely to be swayed by emotions or misinformation.

Critical thinking is an important skill for anyone who wants to be successful in the modern world. It allows us to evaluate information and make reasoned decisions, rather than simply accepting things at face value. 

Thus, employers often want to employ people with strong critical thinking skills. These employees will be able to solve problems by themselves and identify ways to improve the workplace. They will be able to push back against bad decisions and use their own minds to make good decisions.

Furthermore, critical thinking skills are important for students. This is because they need to be able to evaluate information and think through problems with a critical mindset in order to learn and improve.

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 10 Reasons you’re Perpetually Single
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 20 Montessori Toddler Bedrooms (Design Inspiration)
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 21 Montessori Homeschool Setups
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Educationise

10 Innovative Strategies for Promoting Critical Thinking in the Classroom

Are you looking for innovative ways to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom? As an educator, you know the importance of developing strong critical thinking skills in your students. In today’s complex and ever-changing world, critical thinking is a vital skill that can make the difference between success and failure.

Critical Thinking Lessons and Activities

Now you may be wondering how to promote critical thinking in the classroom or how to develop critical thinking skills in students. Well, to help you out, we’ve put together 10 surprising strategies to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom, complete with real-world examples and actionable strategies.

These strategies will guide you on how to improve critical thinking skills in students, ensuring they can analyze, evaluate, and create solutions effectively. By focusing on teaching critical thinking, you can help your students develop the essential skills needed to navigate complex problems both in and out of the classroom.

Strategies for Promoting Critical Thinking in the Classroom

To effectively teach critical thinking, educators must adopt teaching strategies that promote critical thinking by encouraging students to analyze, question, and evaluate information critically. Understanding how to develop critical thinking skills involves integrating activities that challenge students to think deeply and explore multiple perspectives.

By focusing on how to teach critical thinking, teachers can create an environment that nurtures these essential skills, preparing students to navigate complex problems in both academic and real-world contexts.

1. Collaborative Learning

Collaborative learning is an effective way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. By encouraging your students to work together to solve complex problems, you can help them develop skills in analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

For example, you could divide your students into small groups and give them a problem to solve. Each group can then present their solution to the class and the class can evaluate and critique each solution. This not only encourages critical thinking, but it also promotes teamwork and communication skills.

If you are looking for examples of critical thinking in the classroom, then read our article 11 activities that promote critical thinking skills in the classroom .

2. Questioning

Asking open-ended questions is another effective way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. Open-ended questions encourage your students to think deeply about a topic and consider different perspectives.

Read our article: 10 Best Educational Games for Kids That will Shape Their Future

For example, if you’re teaching a lesson on climate change, you could ask your students questions such as “What are the causes of climate change?” and “What are the potential consequences of climate change?” These questions encourage your students to analyze information and think critically about the topic.

3. Active Listening

Encouraging active listening is another way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. When students actively listen to each other, they consider different perspectives and analyze information more deeply.

Think Like a Detective – A Kid’s Guide to Critical Thinking

For example, you could ask your students to work in pairs and have each student share their opinion on a topic. The other student must actively listen and ask follow-up questions to better understand their partner’s perspective. This activity promotes critical thinking skills such as analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

4. Case Studies

Using case studies is another effective way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. Case studies allow your students to apply critical thinking skills to real-world situations.

For example, if you’re teaching a lesson on business ethics , you could present a case study on a company that faced an ethical dilemma. Your students can then analyze the case study and identify potential solutions. This activity promotes critical thinking skills such as analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

Organizing debates is another effective way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. Debates encourage your students to analyze and evaluate different viewpoints on a topic.

For example, if you’re teaching a lesson on gun control, you could organize a debate where half of the class argues for gun control and the other half argues against it. This activity promotes critical thinking skills such as analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

Read our article: Engaging STEM Activities for Elementary, Middle and High School Students

6. Mind Mapping

Using mind mapping is another effective way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. Mind mapping allows your students to organize and analyze complex information.

For example, if you’re teaching a lesson on the solar system, you could have your students create a mind map of the different planets and their characteristics. This activity promotes critical thinking skills such as analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

7. Gamification

Using game-based learning is another effective way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. Game-based learning engages your students and promotes critical thinking skills such as problem-solving, analysis, and evaluation.

For example, you could use an online game that requires your students to solve math problems. This activity promotes critical thinking skills such as problem-solving, analysis, and evaluation.

8. Problem-Based Learning

Using problem-based learning is another effective way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. Problem-based learning requires your students to solve real-world problems using critical thinking skills such as analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

For example, you could present your students with a real-world problem, such as designing a sustainable community. Your students can then work in groups to research and propose solutions to the problem. This activity promotes critical thinking skills such as problem-solving, analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

9. Reflection

Encouraging reflection is another way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. When students reflect on their learning experiences, they can identify areas where they need to improve and develop critical thinking skills.

For example, you could have your students keep a learning journal where they reflect on their learning experiences and identify areas where they need to improve. This activity promotes critical thinking skills such as analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

10. Real-World Applications

Using real-world applications is another effective way to promote critical thinking skills in your classroom. When students can see how the skills they are learning can be applied in the real world, they are more motivated to learn and develop critical thinking skills.

For example, if you’re teaching a lesson on fractions, you could show your students how fractions are used in cooking recipes. This activity promotes critical thinking skills such as analysis, evaluation, and interpretation.

Additionally, exploring various ways to improve critical thinking skills, such as incorporating debate activities and problem-based learning, can significantly enhance student engagement. Teaching critical thinking also involves encouraging critical thinking by fostering an environment where questions are welcomed and diverse perspectives are valued.

By implementing these approaches, you’ll effectively teach critical thinking skills and empower your students to think deeply and independently.

In conclusion, critical thinking skills are essential for success in today’s complex and ever-changing world. As an educator, you can promote critical thinking skills in your classroom by using these 10 surprising ways.

Collaborative learning, questioning, active listening, case studies, debates, mind mapping, gamification, problem-based learning, reflection, and real-world applications are all effective ways to promote critical thinking skills.

To further understand how to enhance critical thinking skills in the classroom, consider integrating hands-on projects that require students to apply their knowledge in practical, real-world scenarios. By incorporating these strategies into your teaching, you can help your students develop the critical thinking skills they need to succeed in the 21st century.

Share this:

Discover more from educationise.

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Type your email…

One thought on “ 10 Innovative Strategies for Promoting Critical Thinking in the Classroom ”

• Pingback: Engaging Problem-Solving Activities That Spark Student Interest - Educationise

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

• Published on February 10, 2018
• February 10, 2018

How to Solve the Biggest Problems With Critical Thinking Exercises

Jump to section

Have you ever wanted to evaluate situations like Sherlock Holmes, or present arguments like an undefeated lawyer? Sick of being the confused and out-of-place individual in any intellectual scrum?

Critical thinking is the art, skill, and practice of getting to the crux of any subject. It allows you to see the big picture and challenge what comes between you and the truth.

This doesn’t come easy; it requires a certain amount of practice before you can become the master of all that matters . It will require the use of critical thinking exercises and practice thereof.

Critical Thinking Exercise Types

Critical thinking starts with the three powerful skills of linking ideas, structuring arguments, and recognizing incongruences. Each area needs to be practiced and applied in order for you to become the best critical thinker you can be.

Below are the three major skills of critical thinking:

• Linking ideas
• Structuring argument s
• Recognizing incongruences

1. Linking ideas

This has to do with finding connections between the seemly unrelatable or irrelevant.

Exercise: Newspaper link up

Take today’s newspaper. Brush through all articles in each section (news, sports, business, etc.). Make a list of the articles as a basic concept.

Now find ways in which each article is linked to each other, in each section of the newspaper. Find the overall theme of each section and if you can, try to link the sections of the newspaper to each other.

Once you have done all of this, try to surmise the agenda or aim of this publication.

2. Structuring arguments

Structuring arguments are elements that are involved in creating a practical, relevant, and sound argument. Before doing this exercise you will have to know what a premise and conclusion of an argument are:

Premise:  A previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion. It is the base of an argument, theory, or undertaking.

Conclusion: The end of an argument, theory, or undertaking. A judgment or decision is reached by reasoning.

Exercise: Recognising the premise and conclusion

Look on YouTube or just on Google for some of the best theories, arguments, or speeches ever given or done.  Take the piece that you have chosen and determine what the premise of the topic is, and what the conclusion is. There can be several premises but they have to support the conclusion.

3. Recognizing incongruences

Recognizing incongruences is the ability to find holes in a theory or argument in order to find the real truth.

Exercise: Challenging the premise

Take the same information from the Recognising premise and conclusion exercise you have done above, and see if you can figure out if any of the premises do not support or link to the conclusion.

If all premises link with the conclusions, then look into the premises themselves. See if there are any false assumptions ( or fallacies ) in the premises and research their validity.

Analyze the premises to see that there has not been a statement that is assumed true but is actually false.

Critical Thinking Exercises for Adults

Too often as adults, we are steadfast and strong in our already formed, accepted, and practiced beliefs.

We often do not challenge what is just accepted as truth or “the way it is.” We could learn a thing or two from the younger side of humanity, especially the way that they question everything, even that which is considered logical.

Exercise: Tell a space alien

You can apply this to any information or theory, but in the interest of practice, you can look for the 10 most interesting theories on the internet.

You will play both the inquisitive space alien and yourself trying to answer and explain the topic.

Start by explaining the topic as if it were to a space alien who has no prior knowledge of Earth and it’s ways, but somehow the alien can speak English. Then become the alien (dress up if you wish) and ask questions about the topic from a completely uninformed perspective.

For example, you would explain a game of tennis, as two people who use a tool called a racquet to hit a ball over a net and into a certain square. The one who does not return the ball loses that round and the other gets a point, until the one has enough points to win.

You as the alien when then ask things such as: Why are there only two people playing? Why does the crowd get so excited? Why does the crowd not jump on the court and get involved? Why do they use racquets and not something else? Etcetera…

Critical Thinking Exercises for College Students

Due to the amount of information absorbed in a term or semester of college, college students don’t get much of a chance to look back on what they have learned. The river of information keeps flowing and the students keep swimming on.

It often happens that a year or two down the line, you will be looking up something that you did in the first year of college. It is thus very important to take at least one day once you are done with the term, to revise and clarify what you have achieved? What could you have done better? And how you could improve on the strategies you applied?

Exercise: Revising the term or semester

At the end of a term or semester of college, take each area of knowledge you have gone through in that time. You can divide this by subject, yet if you feel that certain subjects can be merged into one area of knowledge then do so.

Answer these questions about the college term and the knowledge you gain in that time:

• In your own perception (not the reports’) what was your performance like this term?
• How effective were your strategies in getting through the work? (Time management, studying strategies etc.)
• What would you like to get out of the next term that you didn’t get in this term?
• How could you improve on these strategies?
• What are the major practical skills you acquired from this term and how could they be put to use in future?

Don’t limit the answers to the study work only, but expand into what you learned from the environment or something you inadvertently learned.

For example you learned, useful social and networking skills by being a part of many events and social groups, or you learned how to respond to people of authority effectively when dealing with a difficult lecturer.

Critical Thinking Exercises for Children

Critical thinking Exercises work well for kids as they develop the application of critical thinking. Children are mostly really good at critical thinking questioning; asking why? Why? Why….

Where children usually fall short is self-evaluation and seeing other perspectives.

It is also important to note that there will be different exercises for different age groups. Smaller children do not have the capacity to think in a certain way, just by the way the human brain naturally develops.

Exercise for younger children: Interactive questioning

When children are very young, they won’t have the patience or concentration to stay engaged in a certain activity for too long. The best thing to do for these children is actively use critical thinking exercises in their daily lives.

Ask questions that will actively engage the children in critical thinking such as:

• Open-ended questions – Instead of the regular yes and no answers, inspire your children to elaborate on their answers to create understanding and validation to what they say.
• Encourage Explanations – Ask your child to explain a topic or something they saw with a bit more detail than they would usually give. Make sure they feel as if the question does not have a right or wrong answer, so they have the freedom to express themselves.
• Multiple Answers – This works especially well in situations that are challenging to them. Ask your child what they should do in a certain situation and ask them to come up with at least three different answers or responses.
• Evaluate Decisions – Once something has happened to the child, ask the child what they thought about the situation and how they would handle it differently.

On top of all of this, inspire your kids to question everything. It is absolutely crucial. Here is an inspiring video to help you with this action:

Exercise for older children: Image description Exercises

Older children are a little less inquisitive than the younger children and often get caught up on the right or wrong answer. This makes them less inclined to come up with multiple solutions and usually only give one answer at a time until they get validation that they are correct.

With the image description exercise you take any image (make sure it’s age appropriate) and make them describe what they see and elaborate about the subjects in the picture and the situation of the picture. Push them to give multiple answers and scenarios.

Exercise Your Critical Thought

Critical thinking is an art and a skill and can thus be honed and improved by constant practice and application. The best way to do this is through critical thinking exercises .

Take ten to twenty minutes a day to sharpen your critical thinking and you will soon notice that the rest of your life will be full of inspiration and better understanding.

Unlock your free class

The Power of Boldness With Naveen Jain

Explore the science of thinking boldly with visionary entrepreneur and problem-solver Naveen Jain. Learn how to start realizing game-changing ideas with the power to transform your life and even all of humanity. Get started for free

Irina Yugay

You might also like

Get Started

• Try Mindvalley for Free
• Free Masterclasses
• Coaching Certifications
• Vishen Lakhiani
• The Mindvalley Show
• Partnerships
• In English 🇺🇸
• En Español 🇪🇸
• Editorial Standards
• © 2024 Mindvalley, Inc.
• English (EN)

Fact-Checking: Our Process

Mindvalley is committed to providing reliable and trustworthy content. 

We rely heavily on evidence-based sources, including peer-reviewed studies and insights from recognized experts in various personal growth fields. Our goal is to keep the information we share both current and factual. 

The Mindvalley fact-checking guidelines are based on:

• Content Foundation: Our articles build upon Mindvalley’s quest content, which are meticulously crafted and vetted by industry experts to ensure foundational credibility and reliability.
• Research and Sources: Our team delves into credible research, ensuring every piece is grounded in facts and evidence, offering a holistic view on personal growth topics.
• Continuous Updates: In the dynamic landscape of personal development, we are committed to keeping our content fresh. We often revisit and update our resources to stay abreast of the latest developments.
• External Contributions: We welcome insights from external contributors who share our passion for personal transformation and consciousness elevation.
• Product Recommendations and Affiliations: Recommendations come after thoughtful consideration and alignment with Mindvalley’s ethos, grounded in ethical choices.

To learn more about our dedication to reliable reporting, you can read our detailed editorial standards .

Critical thinking definition

Critical thinking, as described by Oxford Languages, is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement.

Active and skillful approach, evaluation, assessment, synthesis, and/or evaluation of information obtained from, or made by, observation, knowledge, reflection, acumen or conversation, as a guide to belief and action, requires the critical thinking process, which is why it's often used in education and academics.

Some even may view it as a backbone of modern thought.

However, it's a skill, and skills must be trained and encouraged to be used at its full potential.

People turn up to various approaches in improving their critical thinking, like:

• Developing technical and problem-solving skills
• Engaging in more active listening
• Actively questioning their assumptions and beliefs
• Seeking out more diversity of thought
• Opening up their curiosity in an intellectual way etc.

Is critical thinking useful in writing?

Critical thinking can help in planning your paper and making it more concise, but it's not obvious at first. We carefully pinpointed some the questions you should ask yourself when boosting critical thinking in writing:

• What information should be included?
• Which information resources should the author look to?
• What degree of technical knowledge should the report assume its audience has?
• What is the most effective way to show information?
• How should the report be organized?
• How should it be designed?
• What tone and level of language difficulty should the document have?

Usage of critical thinking comes down not only to the outline of your paper, it also begs the question: How can we use critical thinking solving problems in our writing's topic?

Let's say, you have a Powerpoint on how critical thinking can reduce poverty in the United States. You'll primarily have to define critical thinking for the viewers, as well as use a lot of critical thinking questions and synonyms to get them to be familiar with your methods and start the thinking process behind it.

Are there any services that can help me use more critical thinking?

We understand that it's difficult to learn how to use critical thinking more effectively in just one article, but our service is here to help.

We are a team specializing in writing essays and other assignments for college students and all other types of customers who need a helping hand in its making. We cover a great range of topics, offer perfect quality work, always deliver on time and aim to leave our customers completely satisfied with what they ordered.

The ordering process is fully online, and it goes as follows:

• Select the topic and the deadline of your essay.
• Provide us with any details, requirements, statements that should be emphasized or particular parts of the essay writing process you struggle with.
• Leave the email address, where your completed order will be sent to.
• Select your prefered payment type, sit back and relax!

With lots of experience on the market, professionally degreed essay writers , online 24/7 customer support and incredibly low prices, you won't find a service offering a better deal than ours.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 31 August 2024

Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning

• Dandan Li 1 ,
• Xiaolei Fan 2 &
• Lingchao Meng 3  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  20287 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

• Environmental social sciences

Assessing and cultivating students’ HOTS are crucial for interior design education in a blended learning environment. However, current research has focused primarily on the impact of blended learning instructional strategies, learning tasks, and activities on the development of HOTS, whereas few studies have specifically addressed the assessment of these skills through dedicated scales in the context of blended learning. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive scale for assessing HOTS in interior design major students within the context of blended learning. Employing a mixed methods design, the research involved in-depth interviews with 10 education stakeholders to gather qualitative data, which informed the development of a 66-item soft skills assessment scale. The scale was administered to a purposive sample of 359 undergraduate students enrolled in an interior design program at a university in China. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted to evaluate the underlying factor structure of the scale. The findings revealed a robust four-factor model encompassing critical thinking skills, problem-solving skills, teamwork skills, and practical innovation skills. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.948–0.966) and satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity. This scale provides a valuable instrument for assessing and cultivating HOTS among interior design major students in blended learning environments. Future research can utilize a scale to examine the factors influencing the development of these skills and inform instructional practices in the field.

Similar content being viewed by others

A meta-analysis of the effects of design thinking on student learning

Blended knowledge sharing model in design professional

Using design thinking for interdisciplinary curriculum design and teaching: a case study in higher education

Introduction.

In the contemporary landscape of the twenty-first century, students face numerous challenges that necessitate the development of competitive skills, with a particular emphasis on the cultivation of HOTS 1 , 2 , 3 , this has become a crucial objective in educational reform. Notably, it is worth noting that the National Education Association (NEA, 2012) has clearly identified critical thinking and problem-solving, communication, collaboration, creativity, and innovation as key competencies that students must possess in the current era, which are considered important components of twenty-first century skills 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 . As learners in the fields of creativity and design, students in the interior design profession also need to possess HOTS to address complex design problems and the evolving demands of the industry 8 , 9 .

Currently, blended learning has become an important instructional model in interior design education 10 , 11 . It serves as a teaching approach that combines traditional face-to-face instruction with online learning, providing students with a more flexible and personalized learning experience 12 , 13 . Indeed, several scholars have recognized the benefits of blended learning in providing students with diverse learning resources, activities, and opportunities for interaction, thereby fostering HOTS 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 . For example, blended learning, as evidenced by studies conducted by Anthony et al. 10 and Castro 11 , has demonstrated its efficacy in enhancing students' HOTS. The integration of online resources, virtual practices, and online discussions in blended learning fosters active student engagement and improves critical thinking, problem solving, and creative thinking skills. Therefore, teachers need to determine appropriate assessment methods and construct corresponding assessment tasks to assess students' expected learning outcomes. This decision requires teachers to have a clear understanding of students' learning progress and the development of various skills, whereas students have knowledge of only their scores and lack awareness of their individual skill development 18 , 19 .

Nevertheless, the precise assessment of students' HOTS in the blended learning milieu poses a formidable challenge. The dearth of empirically validated assessment tools impedes researchers from effectively discerning students' levels of cognitive aptitude and developmental growth within the blended learning realm 20 , 21 , 22 . In addition, from the perspective of actual research topics, current studies on blended learning focus mainly on the "concept, characteristics, mechanisms, models, and supporting technologies of blended learning 23 . " Research on "measuring students' HOTS in blended learning" is relatively limited, with most of the focus being on elementary, middle, and high school students 24 , 25 . Few studies have specifically examined HOTS measurement in the context of university students 26 , 27 , particularly in practical disciplines such as interior design. For example, Bervell et al. 28 suggested that the lack of high-quality assessment scales inevitably impacts the quality of research. Additionally, Schmitt 29 proposed the “Three Cs” principle for measurement, which includes clarity, coherence, and consistency. He highlighted that high-quality assessment scales should possess clear and specific measurement objectives, logically coherent items, and consistent measurement results to ensure the reliability and validity of the data. This reflects the importance of ensuring the alignment of the measurement goals of assessment scales with the research questions and the content of the discipline in the design of assessments.

The development of an assessment scale within the blended learning environment is expected to address the existing gap in measuring and assessing HOTS scores in interior design education. This scale not only facilitates the assessment of students' HOTS but also serves as a guide for curriculum design, instructional interventions, and student support initiatives. Ultimately, the integration of this assessment scale within the blended learning environment has the potential to optimize the development of HOTS among interior design students, empowering them to become adept critical thinkers, creative problem solvers, and competent professionals in the field.

Therefore, this study follows a scientific scale development procedure to develop an assessment scale specifically designed to measure the HOTS of interior design students in blended learning environments. This endeavor aims to provide educators with a reliable instrument for assessing students' progress in cultivating and applying HOTS, thus enabling the implementation of more effective teaching strategies and enhancing the overall quality of interior design education. The research questions are as follows:

What key dimensions should be considered when developing a HOTS assessment scale to accurately capture students' HOTS in an interior design major blended learning environment?

How can an advanced thinking skills assessment scale for blended learning in interior design be developed?

How can the reliability and validity of the HOTS assessment scale be verified and ensured, and is it reliable and effective in the interior design of major blended learning environments?

Key dimensions of HOTS assessment scale in an interior design major blended learning environment

The research results indicate that in the blended learning environment of interior design, this study identified 16 initial codes representing key dimensions for enhancing students' HOTS. These codes were further categorized into 8 main categories and 4 overarching themes: critical thinking, problem-solving, teamwork skills and practical innovation skills. They provide valuable insights for data comprehension and analysis, serving as a comprehensive framework for the HOTS scale. Analyzing category frequency and assessing its significance and universality in a qualitative dataset hold significant analytical value 30 , 31 . High-frequency terms indicate the central position of specific categories in participants' narratives, texts, and other data forms 32 . Through interviews with interior design experts and teachers, all core categories were mentioned more than 20 times, providing compelling evidence of their universality and importance within the field of interior design's HOTS dimensions. As shown in Table 1 .

Themes 1: critical thinking skills

Critical thinking skills constitute a key core category in blended learning environments for interior design and are crucial for cultivating students' HOTS. This discovery emphasizes the importance of critical thinking in interior design learning. This mainly includes the categories of logical reasoning and judgment, doubt and reflection, with a frequency of more than 8, highlighting the importance of critical thinking skills. Therefore, a detailed discussion of each feature is warranted. As shown in Table 2 .

Category 1: logical reasoning and judgment

The research results indicate that in a blended learning environment for interior design, logical reasoning and judgment play a key role in cultivating critical thinking skills. Logical reasoning refers to inferring reasonable conclusions from information through analysis and evaluation 33 . Judgment is based on logic and evidence for decision-making and evaluation. The importance of these concepts lies in their impact on the development and enhancement of students' HOTS. According to the research results, interior design experts and teachers unanimously believe that logical reasoning and judgment are very important. For example, as noted by Interviewee 1, “For students, logical reasoning skills are still very important. Especially in indoor space planning, students use logical reasoning to determine whether the layout of different functional areas is reasonable”. Similarly, Interviewee 2 also stated that “logical reasoning can help students conduct rational analysis of various design element combinations during the conceptual design stage, such as color matching, material selection, and lighting application”.

As emphasized by interviewees 1 and 2, logical reasoning and judgment are among the core competencies of interior designers in practical applications. These abilities enable designers to analyze and evaluate design problems and derive reasonable solutions from them. In the interior design industry, being able to conduct accurate logical reasoning and judgment is one of the key factors for success. Therefore, through targeted training and practice, students can enhance their logical thinking and judgment, thereby better addressing design challenges and providing innovative solutions.

Category 2: skepticism and reflection

Skepticism and reflection play crucial roles in cultivating students' critical thinking skills in a blended learning environment for interior design. Doubt can prompt students to question and explore information and viewpoints, whereas reflection helps students think deeply and evaluate their own thinking process 34 . These abilities are crucial for cultivating students' higher-order thinking skills. According to the research findings, most interior design experts and teachers agree that skepticism and reflection are crucial. For example, as noted by interviewees 3, “Sometimes, when facing learning tasks, students will think about how to better meet the needs of users”. Meanwhile, Interviewee 4 also agreed with this viewpoint. As emphasized by interviewees 3 and 4, skepticism and reflection are among the core competencies of interior designers in practical applications. These abilities enable designers to question existing perspectives and practices and propose innovative design solutions through in-depth thinking and evaluation. Therefore, in the interior design industry, designers with the ability to doubt and reflect are better able to respond to complex design needs and provide clients with unique and valuable design solutions.

Themes 2: problem-solving skills

The research findings indicate that problem-solving skills constitute a key core category in blended learning environments for interior design and are crucial for cultivating students' HOTS. This discovery emphasizes the importance of problem-solving skills in interior design learning. Specifically, categories such as identifying and defining problems, as well as developing and implementing plans, have been studied more than 8 times, highlighting the importance of problem-solving skills. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss each function in detail to better understand and cultivate students' problem-solving skills. As shown in Table 3 .

Category 1: identifying and defining issues

The research findings indicate that in a blended learning environment for interior design, identifying and defining problems play a crucial role in fostering students' problem-solving skills. Identifying and defining problems require students to possess the ability to analyze and evaluate problems, enabling them to accurately determine the essence of the problems and develop effective strategies and approaches to solve them 35 . Interior design experts and teachers widely recognize the importance of identifying and defining problems as core competencies in interior design practice. For example, Interviewee 5 emphasized the importance of identifying and defining problems, stating, "In interior design, identifying and defining problems is the first step in addressing design challenges. Students need to be able to clearly identify the scope, constraints, and objectives of the problems to engage in targeted thinking and decision-making in the subsequent design process." Interviewee 6 also supported this viewpoint. As stressed by Interviewees 5 and 6, identifying and defining problems not only require students to possess critical thinking abilities but also necessitate broad professional knowledge and understanding. Students need to comprehend principles of interior design, spatial planning, human behavior, and other relevant aspects to accurately identify and define problems associated with design tasks.

Category 2: developing and implementing a plan

The research results indicate that in a blended learning environment for interior design, developing and implementing plans plays a crucial role in cultivating students' problem-solving abilities. The development and implementation of a plan refers to students identifying and defining problems, devising specific solutions, and translating them into concrete implementation plans. Specifically, after determining the design strategy, students refine it into specific implementation steps and timelines, including drawing design drawings, organizing PPT reports, and presenting design proposals. For example, Interviewee 6 noted, “Students usually break down design strategies into specific tasks and steps by refining them.” Other interviewees also unanimously support this viewpoint. As emphasized by respondent 6, developing and implementing plans can help students maintain organizational, systematic, and goal-oriented problem-solving skills, thereby enhancing their problem-solving skills.

Themes 3: teamwork skills

The research results indicate that teamwork skills constitute a key core category in blended learning environments for interior design and are crucial for cultivating students' HOTS. This discovery emphasizes the importance of teamwork skills in interior design learning. This mainly includes communication and coordination and division of labor and collaboration, which are mentioned frequently in the interview documents. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss each function in detail to better understand and cultivate students' teamwork skills. As shown in Table 4 .

Category 1: communication and coordination

The research results indicate that communication and collaboration play crucial roles in cultivating students' teamwork abilities in a blended learning environment for interior design. Communication and collaboration refer to the ability of students to effectively share information, understand each other's perspectives, and work together to solve problems 36 . Specifically, team members need to understand each other's resource advantages integrate and share these resources to improve work efficiency and project quality. For example, Interviewee 7 noted, “In interior design, one member may be skilled in spatial planning, while another member may be skilled in color matching. Through communication and collaboration, team members can collectively utilize this expertise to improve work efficiency and project quality.” Other interviewees also unanimously believe that this viewpoint can promote students' teamwork skills, thereby promoting the development of their HOTS. As emphasized by the viewpoints of these interviewees, communication and collaboration enable team members to collectively solve problems and overcome challenges. Through effective communication, team members can exchange opinions and suggestions with each other, provide different solutions, and make joint decisions. Collaboration and cooperation among team members contribute to brainstorming and finding the best solution.

Category 2: division of labor and collaboration

The research results indicate that in the blended learning environment of interior design, the division of labor and collaboration play crucial roles in cultivating students' teamwork ability. The division of labor and collaboration refer to the ability of team members to assign different tasks and roles in a project based on their respective expertise and responsibilities and work together to complete the project 37 . For example, Interviewee 8 noted, “In an internal design project, some students are responsible for space planning, some students are responsible for color matching, and some students are responsible for rendering production.” Other interviewees also support this viewpoint. As emphasized by interviewee 8, the division of labor and collaboration help team members fully utilize their respective expertise and abilities, promote resource integration and complementarity, cultivate a spirit of teamwork, and enable team members to collaborate, support, and trust each other to achieve project goals together.

Themes 4: practical innovation skills

The research results indicate that practical innovation skills constitute a key core category in blended learning environments for interior design and are crucial for cultivating students' HOTS. This discovery emphasizes the importance of practical innovation skills in interior design learning. This mainly includes creative conception and design expression, as well as innovative application of materials and technology, which are often mentioned in interview documents. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss each function in detail to better understand and cultivate students' practical innovation skills. As shown in Table 5 .

Category 1: creative conception and design expression

The research results indicate that in the blended learning environment of interior design, creative ideation and design expression play crucial roles in cultivating students' practical and innovative skills. Creative ideation and design expression refer to the ability of students to break free from traditional thinking frameworks and try different design ideas and methods through creative ideation, which helps stimulate their creativity and cultivate their ability to think independently and solve problems. For example, interviewee 10 noted that "blended learning environments combine online and offline teaching modes, allowing students to acquire knowledge and skills more flexibly. Through learning and practice, students can master various expression tools and techniques, such as hand-drawn sketches, computer-aided design software, model making, etc., thereby more accurately conveying their design concepts." Other interviewees also expressed the importance of this viewpoint, emphasizing the importance of creative ideas and design expression in blended learning environments that cannot be ignored. As emphasized by interviewee 10, creative ideation and design expression in the blended learning environment of interior design can not only enhance students' creative thinking skills and problem-solving abilities but also strengthen their application skills in practical projects through diverse expression tools and techniques. The cultivation of these skills is crucial for students' success in their future careers.

Category 2: innovative application of materials and technology

Research findings indicate that the innovative application of materials and technology plays a crucial role in developing students' practical and creative skills within a blended learning environment for interior design. The innovative application of materials and technology refers to students' exploration and utilization of new materials and advanced technologies, enabling them to overcome the limitations of traditional design thinking and experiments with diverse design methods and approaches. This process not only stimulates their creativity but also significantly enhances their problem-solving skills. Specifically, the innovative application of materials and technology involves students gaining a deep understanding of the properties of new materials and their application methods in design, as well as becoming proficient in various advanced technological tools and equipment, such as 3D printing, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR). These skills enable students to more accurately realize their design concepts and effectively apply them in real-world projects.

For example, Interviewee 1 stated, "The blended learning environment combines online and offline teaching modes, allowing students to flexibly acquire the latest knowledge on materials and technology and apply these innovations in real projects." Other interviewees also emphasized the importance of this view. Therefore, the importance of the innovative application of materials and technology in a blended learning environment cannot be underestimated. As emphasized by interviewee 1, the innovative application of materials and technologies is crucial in the blended learning environment of interior design. This process not only enables students to flexibly acquire the latest materials and technical knowledge but also enables them to apply these innovations to practice in practical projects, thereby improving their practical abilities and professional ethics.

In summary, through research question 1 research, the dimensions of the HOTS assessment scale in blended learning for interior design include four main aspects: critical thinking skills, problem-solving skills, teamwork skills, and practical innovation skills. Based on the assessment scales developed by previous scholars in various dimensions, the researcher developed a HOTS assessment scale suitable for blended learning environments in interior design and collected feedback from interior design experts through interviews.

Development of the HOTS assessment scale

The above research results indicate that the dimensions of the HOTS scale mainly include critical thinking, problem-solving, teamwork skills and practical innovation skills. The dimensions of a scale represent the abstract characteristics and structure of the concept being measured. Since these dimensions are often abstract and difficult to measure directly, they need to be converted into several concrete indicators that can be directly observed or self-reported 38 . These concrete indicators, known as dimension items, operationalize the abstract dimensions, allowing for the measurement and evaluation of various aspects of the concept. This process transforms the abstract dimensions into specific, measurable components. The following content is based on the results of research question 1 to develop an advanced thinking skills assessment scale for mixed learning in interior design.

Dimension 1: critical thinking skills

The research results indicate that critical thinking skills constitute a key core category in blended learning environments for interior design and are crucial for cultivating students' HOTS. Critical thinking skills refer to the ability to analyze information objectively and make a reasoned judgment 39 . Scholars tend to emphasize this concept as a method of general skepticism, rational thinking, and self-reflection 7 , 40 . For example, Goodsett 26 suggested that it should be based on rational skepticism and careful thought about external matters as well as open self-reflection about internal thoughts and actions. Moreover, the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI) is widely used to measure critical thinking skills, including dimensions such as seeking truth, confidence, questioning and courage to seek truth, curiosity and openness, as well as analytical and systematic methods 41 . In addition, maturity means continuous adjustment and improvement of a person's cognitive system and learning activities through continuous awareness, reflection, and self-awareness 42 . Moreover, Nguyen 43 confirmed that critical thinking and cognitive maturity can be achieved through these activities, emphasizing that critical thinking includes cognitive skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, as well as emotional tendencies such as curiosity and openness.

In addition, in a blended learning environment for interior design, critical thinking skills help students better understand, evaluate, and apply design knowledge and skills, cultivating independent thinking and innovation abilities 44 . If students lack these skills, they may accept superficial information and solutions without sufficient thinking and evaluation, resulting in the overlooking of important details or the selection of inappropriate solutions in the design process. Therefore, for the measurement of critical thinking skills, the focus should be on cognitive skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, as well as curiosity and open mindedness. The specific items for critical thinking skills are shown in Table 6 .

Dimension 2: problem-solving skills

Problem-solving skills constitute a key core category in blended learning environments for interior design and are crucial for cultivating students' HOTS. Problem-solving skills involve the ability to analyze and solve problems by understanding them, identifying their root causes, and developing appropriate solutions 45 . According to the 5E-based STEM education approach, problem-solving skills encompass the following abilities: problem identification and definition, formulation of problem-solving strategies, problem representation, resource allocation, and monitoring and evaluation of solution effectiveness 7 , 46 . Moreover, D'zurilla and Nezu 47 and Tan 48 indicated that attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge skills during problem solving, as well as the quality of proposed solutions and observable outcomes, are demonstrated. In addition, D'Zurilla and Nezu devised the Social Problem-Solving Inventory (SPSI), which comprises seven subscales: cognitive response, emotional response, behavioral response, problem identification, generation of alternative solutions, decision-making, and solution implementation. Based on these research results, the problem-solving skills dimension questions designed in this study are shown in Table 7 .

Dimension 3: teamwork skills

The research results indicate that teamwork skills constitute a key core category in blended learning environments for interior design and are crucial for cultivating students' HOTS. Teamwork skills refer to the ability to effectively collaborate, coordinate, and communicate with others in a team environment 49 . For example, the Teamwork Skills Assessment Tool (TWKSAT) developed by Stevens and Campion 50 identifies five core dimensions of teamwork: conflict management; collaborative problem-solving; communication; goal setting; performance management; decision-making; and task coordination. The design of this tool highlights the essential skills in teamwork and provides a structured approach for evaluating these skills. In addition, he indicated that successful teams need to have a range of skills for problem solving, including situational control, conflict management, decision-making and coordination, monitoring and feedback, and an open mindset. These skills help team members effectively address complex challenges and demonstrate the team’s collaboration and flexibility. Therefore, the assessment of learners' teamwork skills needs to cover the above aspects. As shown in Table 8 .

Dimension 4: practice innovative skills

The research results indicate that practical innovation skills constitute a key core category in blended learning environments for interior design, which is crucial for cultivating students' HOTS. The practice of innovative skills encompasses the utilization of creative cognitive processes and problem-solving strategies to facilitate the generation of original ideas, solutions, and approaches 51 . This practice places significant emphasis on two critical aspects: creative conception and design expression, as well as the innovative application of materials and technology. Tang et al. 52 indicated that creative conception and design expression involve the generation and articulation of imaginative and inventive ideas within a given context. With the introduction of concepts such as 21st-century learning skills, the "5C" competency framework, and core student competencies, blended learning has emerged as the goal and direction of educational reform. It aims to promote the development of students' HOTS, equipping them with the essential qualities and key abilities needed for lifelong development and societal advancement. Blended learning not only emphasizes the mastery of core learning content but also requires students to develop critical thinking, complex problem-solving, creative thinking, and practical innovation skills. To adapt to the changes and developments in the blended learning environment, this study designed 13 preliminary test items based on 21st-century learning skills, the "5C" competency framework, core student competencies, and the TTCT assessment scale developed by Torrance 53 . These items aim to assess students' practice of innovative skills within a blended learning environment, as shown in Table 9 .

The researchers' results indicate that the consensus among the interviewed expert participants is that the structural integrity of the scale is satisfactory and does not require modification. However, certain measurement items have been identified as problematic and require revision. The primary recommendations are as follows: Within the domain of problem-solving skills, the item "I usually conduct classroom and online learning with questions and clear goals" was deemed biased because of its emphasis on the "online" environment. Consequently, the evaluation panel advised splitting this item into two separate components: (1) "I am adept at frequently adjusting and reversing a negative team atmosphere" and (2) "I consistently engage in praising and encouraging others, fostering harmonious relationships. “The assessment process requires revisions and adjustments to specific projects, forming a pilot test scale consisting of 66 observable results from the original 65 items. In addition, there were other suggestions about linguistic formulation and phraseology, which are not expounded upon herein.

Verify the effectiveness of the HOTS assessment scale

The research results indicate that there are significant differences in the average scores of the four dimensions of the HOTS, including critical thinking skills (A1–A24 items), problem-solving skills (B1–B13 items), teamwork skills (C1–C16 items), and practical innovation skills (D1–D13 items). Moreover, this also suggests that each item has discriminative power. Specifically, this will be explained through the following aspects.

Project analysis based on the CR value

The critical ratio (CR) method, which uses the CR value (decision value) to remove measurement items with poor discrimination, is the most used method in project analysis. The specific process involves the use of the CR value (critical value) to identify and remove such items. First, the modified pilot test scale data are aggregated and sorted. Individuals representing the top and bottom 27% of the distribution were subsequently selected, constituting 66 respondents in each group. The high-score group comprises individuals with a total score of 127 or above (including 127), whereas the low-score group comprises individuals with a total score of 99 or below (including 99). Finally, an independent sample t test was conducted to determine the significant differences in the mean scores for each item between the high-score and low-score groups. The statistical results are presented in Table 10 .

The above table shows that independent sample t tests were conducted for all the items; their t values were greater than 3, and their p values were less than 0.001, indicating that the difference between the highest and lowest 27% of the samples was significant and that each item had discriminative power.

In summary, based on previous research and relevant theories, the HOTS scale for interior design was revised. This revision process involved interviews with interior design experts, teachers, and students, followed by item examination and homogeneity testing via the critical ratio (CR) method. The results revealed significant correlations ( p  < 0.01) between all the items and the total score, with correlation coefficients (R) above 0.4. Therefore, the scale exhibits good accuracy and internal consistency in capturing measured HOTS. These findings provide a reliable foundation for further research and practical applications.

Pilot study exploratory factor analysis

This study used SPSS (version 28) to conduct the KMO and Bartlett tests on the scale. The total HOTS test scale as well as the KMO and Bartlett sphericities were first calculated for the four subscales to ensure that the sample data were suitable for factor analysis 7 . The overall KMO value is 0.946, indicating that the data are highly suitable for factor analysis. Additionally, Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant, further supporting the appropriateness of conducting factor analysis ( p  < 0.05). All the values are above 0.7, indicating that the data for these subscales are also suitable for factor analysis. According to Javadi et al. 54 , these results suggest the presence of shared factors among the items within the subscales, as shown in Table 11 .

For each subscale, exploratory factor analysis was conducted to extract factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 while eliminating items with communalities less than 0.30, loadings less than 0.50, and items that cross multiple (more than one) common factors 55 , 56 . Additionally, items that were inconsistent with the assumed structure of the measure were identified and eliminated to ensure the best structural validity. These principles were applied to the factor analysis of each subscale, ensuring that the extracted factor structure and observed items are consistent with the hypothesized measurement structure and analysis results, as shown in the table 55 , 58 . In the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the latent variables were effectively interpreted and demonstrated a significant response, with cumulative explained variances of the common factors exceeding 60%. This finding confirms the alignment between the scale structure, comprising the remaining items, and the initial theoretical framework proposed in this study. Additionally, the items were systematically reorganized to construct the final questionnaire. Consequently, items A1 to A24 were associated with the critical thinking skills dimension, items B25 to B37 were linked to problem-solving skills, items C38 to C53 were indicative of teamwork skills, and items D54 to D66 were reflective of practical innovation skills. As shown in Table 12 below.

In addition, the criterion for extracting principal components in factor analysis is typically based on eigenvalues, with values greater than 1 indicating greater explanatory power than individual variables. The variance contribution ratio reflects the proportion of variance explained by each principal component relative to the total variance and signifies the ability of the principal component to capture comprehensive information. The cumulative variance contribution ratio measures the accumulated proportion of variance explained by the selected principal components, aiding in determining the optimal number of components to retain while minimizing information loss. The above table shows that four principal components can be extracted from the data, and their cumulative variance contribution rate reaches 59.748%.

However, from the scree plot (as shown in Fig.  1 ), the slope flattens starting from the fifth factor, indicating that no distinct factors can be extracted beyond that point. Therefore, retaining four factors seems more appropriate. The factor loading matrix is the core of factor analysis, and the values in the matrix represent the factor loading of each item on the common factors. Larger values indicate a stronger correlation between the item variable and the common factor. For ease of analysis, this study used the maximum variance method to rotate the initial factor loading matrix, redistributing the relationships between the factors and original variables and making the correlation coefficients range from 0 to 1, which facilitates interpretation. In this study, factor loadings with absolute values less than 0.4 were filtered out. According to the analysis results, the items of the HOTS assessment scale can be divided into four dimensions, which is consistent with theoretical expectations.

Gravel plot of factors.

Through the pretest of the scale and selection of measurement items, 66 measurement items were ultimately determined. On this basis, a formal scale for assessing HOTS in a blended learning environment was developed, and the reliability and validity of the scale were tested to ultimately confirm its usability.

Confirmatory factor analysis of final testing

Final test employed that AMOS (version 26.0), a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the retested sample data to validate the stability of the HOTS structural model obtained through exploratory factor analysis. This analysis aimed to assess the fit between the measurement results and the actual data, confirming the robustness of the derived HOTS structure and its alignment with the empirical data. The relevant model was constructed based on the factor structure of each component obtained through EFA and the observed variables, as shown in the diagram. The model fit indices are presented in Fig.  2 (among them, A represents critical thinking skills, B represents problem-solving skills, C represents teamwork skills, and D represents practical innovation skills). The models strongly support the "4-dimensional" structure of the HOTS, which includes four first-order factors: critical thinking skills, problem-solving skills, teamwork skills, and practical innovation skills. Critical thinking skills play a pivotal role in the blended learning environment of interior design, connecting problem-solving skills, teamwork skills, and innovative practices. These four dimensions form the assessment structure of HOTS, with critical thinking skills serving as the core element, inspiring individuals to assess problems and propose innovative solutions. By providing appropriate learning resources, diverse learning activities, and learning tasks, as well as designing items for assessment scales, it is possible to delve into the measurement and development of HOTS in the field of interior design, providing guidance for educational and organizational practices. This comprehensive approach to learning and assessment helps cultivate students' HOTS and lays a solid foundation for their comprehensive abilities in the field of interior design. Thus, the CFA structural models provide strong support for the initial hypothesis of the proposed HOTS assessment structure in this study. As shown in Fig.  2 .

Confirmatory factor analysis based on 4 dimensions. *A represents the dimension of critical thinking. B represents the dimension of problem-solving skills. C represents the dimension of teamwork skills. D represents the dimension of practical innovation skills.

Additionally, χ2. The fitting values of RMSEA and SRMR are both below the threshold, whereas the fitting values of the other indicators are all above the threshold, indicating that the model fits well. As shown in Table 13 .

Reliability and validity analysis

The reliability and validity of the scale need to be assessed after the model fit has been determined through validation factor analysis 57 . Based on the findings of Marsh et al. 57 , the following conclusions can be drawn. In terms of hierarchical and correlational model fit, the standardized factor loadings of each item range from 0.700 to 0.802, all of which are greater than or equal to 0.7. This indicates a strong correspondence between the observed items and each latent variable. Furthermore, the Cronbach's α coefficients, which are used to assess the internal consistency or reliability of the scale, ranged from 0.948 to 0.966 for each dimension, indicating a high level of data reliability and internal consistency. The composite reliabilities ranged from 0.948 to 0.967, exceeding the threshold of 0.6 and demonstrating a substantial level of consistency (as shown in Table 14 ).

Additionally, the diagonal bold font represents the square root of the AVE for each dimension. All the dimensions have average variance extracted (AVE) values ranging from 0.551 to 0.589, all of which are greater than 0.5, indicating that the latent variables have strong explanatory power for their corresponding items. These results suggest that the scale structure constructed in this study is reliable and effective. Furthermore, according to the results presented in Table 15 , the square roots of the AVE values for each dimension are greater than the absolute values of the correlations with other dimensions, indicating discriminant validity of the data. Therefore, these four subscales demonstrate good convergent and discriminant validity, indicating that they are both interrelated and independent. This implies that they can effectively capture the content required to complete the HOTS test scale.

Discussion and conclusion

The assessment scale for HOTS in interior design blended learning encompasses four dimensions: critical thinking skills, problem-solving skills, teamwork skills, and practical innovation skills. The selection of these dimensions is based on the characteristics and requirements of the interior design discipline, which aims to comprehensively evaluate students' HOTS demonstrated in blended learning environments to better cultivate their ability to successfully address complex design projects in practice. Notably, multiple studies have shown that HOTSs include critical thinking, problem-solving skills, creative thinking, and decision-making skills, which are considered crucial in various fields, such as education, business, and engineering 20 , 59 , 60 , 61 . Compared with prior studies, these dimensions largely mirror previous research outcomes, with notable distinctions in the emphasis on teamwork skills and practical innovation skills 62 , 63 . Teamwork skills underscore the critical importance of collaboration in contemporary design endeavors, particularly within the realm of interior design 64 . Effective communication and coordination among team members are imperative for achieving collective design objectives.

Moreover, practical innovation skills aim to increase students' capacity for creatively applying theoretical knowledge in practical design settings. Innovation serves as a key driver of advancement in interior design, necessitating students to possess innovative acumen and adaptability to evolving design trends for industry success. Evaluating practical innovation skills aims to motivate students toward innovative thinking, exploration of novel concepts, and development of unique design solutions, which is consistent with the dynamic and evolving nature of the interior design sector. Prior research suggests a close interplay between critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, teamwork competencies, and creative thinking, with teamwork skills acting as a regulatory factor for critical and creative thought processes 7 , 65 . This interconnected nature of HOTS provides theoretical support for the construction and validation of a holistic assessment framework for HOTS.

After the examination by interior design expert members, one item needed to be split into two items. The results of the CR (construct validity) analysis of the scale items indicate that independent sample t tests were subsequently conducted on all the items. The t values were greater than 3, with p values less than 0.001, indicating significant differences between the top and bottom 27% of the samples and demonstrating the discriminant validity of each item. This discovery highlights the diversity and effectiveness of the scale's internal items, revealing the discriminatory power of the scale in assessing the study subjects. The high t values and significant p values reflect the substantiality of the internal items in distinguishing between different sample groups, further confirming the efficacy of these items in evaluating the target characteristics. These results provide a robust basis for further refinement and optimization of the scale and offer guidance for future research, emphasizing the importance of scale design in research and providing strong support for data interpretation and analysis.

This process involves evaluating measurement scales through EFA, and it was found that the explanatory variance of each subscale reached 59.748%, and the CR, AVE, Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson correlation coefficient values of the total scale and subscales were in a better state, which strongly demonstrates the structure, discrimination, and convergence effectiveness of the scale 57 .

The scale structure and items of this study are reliable and effective, which means that students in the field of interior design can use them to test their HOTS level and assess their qualities and abilities. In addition, scholars can use this scale to explore the relationships between students' HOTS and external factors, personal personalities, etc., to determine different methods and strategies for developing and improving HOTS.

Limitations and future research

The developed mixed learning HOTS assessment scale for interior design also has certain limitations that need to be addressed in future research. The first issue is that, owing to the requirement of practical innovation skills, students need to have certain practical experience and innovative abilities. First-grade students usually have not yet had sufficient opportunities for learning and practical experience, so it may not be possible to evaluate their abilities effectively in this dimension. Therefore, when this scale is used for assessment, it is necessary to consider students' grade level and learning experience to ensure the applicability and accuracy of the assessment tool. For first-grade students, it may be necessary to use other assessment tools that are suitable for their developmental stage and learning experience to evaluate other aspects of their HOTS 7 . Future research should focus on expanding the scope of this dimension to ensure greater applicability.

The second issue is that the sample comes from ordinary private undergraduate universities in central China and does not come from national public universities or key universities. Therefore, there may be regional characteristics in the obtained data. These findings suggest that the improved model should be validated with a wider range of regional origins, a more comprehensive school hierarchy, and a larger sample size. The thirdly issue is the findings of this study are derived from self-reported data collected from participants through surveys. However, it is important to note that the literature suggests caution in heavily relying on such self-reported data, as perception does not always equate to actions 66 . In addition, future research can draw on this scale to evaluate the HOTS of interior design students, explore the factors that affect their development, determine their training and improvement paths, and cultivate skilled talent for the twenty-first century.

This study adopts a mixed method research approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon 67 . By integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods, mixed methods research provides a comprehensive and detailed exploration of research questions, using multiple data sources and analytical methods to obtain accurate and meaningful answers 68 . To increase the quality of the research, the entire study followed the guidelines for scale development procedures outlined by Professor Li after the data were obtained. As shown in Fig.  3

Scale development program.

Basis of theory

This study is guided by educational objectives such as 21st-century learning skills, the "5C" competency framework, and students' core abilities 4 . The construction process of the scale is based on theoretical foundations, including Bloom's taxonomy. Drawing from existing research, such as the CCTDI 41 , SPSI 69 , and TWKSAT scales, the dimensions and preliminary items of the scale were developed. Additionally, to enhance the validity and reliability of the scale, dimensions related to HOTS in interior design were obtained through semi-structured interviews, and the preliminary project adapted or directly cited existing research results. The preliminary items were primarily adapted or directly referenced from existing research findings. Based on existing research, such as the CCTDI, SPSI, TWKSAT, and twenty-first century skills frameworks, this study takes "critical thinking skills, problem-solving skills, teamwork skills, and practical innovative skills" as the four basic dimensions of the scale.

Participants and procedures

This study is based on previous research and develops a HOTS assessment scale to measure the thinking levels of interior design students in blended learning. By investigating the challenges and opportunities students encounter in blended learning environments and exploring the complexity and diversity of their HOTS, this study aims to obtain comprehensive insights. For research question 1, via the purposive sampling method, 10 interior design experts are selected to investigate the dimensions and evaluation indicators of HOTS in blended learning of interior design. The researcher employed a semi structured interview method, and a random sampling technique was used to select 10 senior experts and teachers in the field of interior design, holding the rank of associate professor or above. This included 5 males and 5 females. As shown in Table 16 .

For research question 2 and 3, the research was conducted at an undergraduate university in China, in the field of interior design and within a blended learning environment. In addition, a statement confirms that all experimental plans have been approved by the authorized committee of Zhengzhou University of Finance and Economics. In the process of practice, the methods used were all in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. The Interior Design Blended Learning HOTS assessment scale was developed based on sample data from 350 students who underwent one pre-test and retest. The participants in the study consisted of second-, third-, and fourth-grade students who had participated in at least one blended learning course. The sample sizes were 115, 118, and 117 for the respective grade levels, totaling 350 individuals. Among the participants, there were 218 male students and 132 female students, all of whom were within the age range of 19–22 years. Through purposeful sampling, this study ensured the involvement of relevant participants and focused on a specific university environment with diverse demographic characteristics and rich educational resources.

This approach enhances the reliability and generalizability of the research and contributes to a deeper understanding of the research question (as shown in Table 17 ).

Instruments

The tools used in this study include semi structured interview guidelines and the HOTS assessment scale developed by the researchers. For research question 1, the semi structured interview guidelines were reviewed by interior design experts to ensure the accuracy and appropriateness of their content and questions. In addition, for research question 2 and 3, the HOTS assessment scale developed by the researchers will be checked via the consistency ratio (CR) method to assess the consistency and reliability of the scale items and validate their effectiveness.

Data analysis

For research question 1, the researcher will utilize the NVivo version 14 software tool to conduct thematic analysis on the data obtained through semi structured interviews. Thematic analysis is a commonly used qualitative research method that aims to identify and categorize themes, concepts, and perspectives that emerge within a dataset 70 . By employing NVivo software, researchers can effectively organize and manage large amounts of textual data and extract themes and patterns from them.

For research question 2, the critical ratio (CR) method was employed to conduct item analysis and homogeneity testing on the items of the pilot test questionnaire. The CR method allows for the assessment of each item's contribution to the total score and the evaluation of the interrelationships among the items within the questionnaire. These analytical techniques served to facilitate the evaluation and validation of the scale's reliability and validity.

For research question 3, this study used SPSS (version 26), in which confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the confirmatory sample data via maximum likelihood estimation. The purpose of this analysis was to verify whether the hypothesized factor structure model of the questionnaire aligned with the actual survey data. Finally, several indices, including composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and the Pearson correlation coefficient, were computed to assess the reliability and validity of the developed scale and assess its reliability and validity.

In addition, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are commonly utilized techniques in questionnaire development and adaptation research 31 , 70 . The statistical software packages SPSS and AMOS are frequently employed for implementing these analytical techniques 71 , 72 , 73 . CFA is a data-driven approach to factor generation that does not require a predetermined number of factors or specific relationships with observed variables. Its focus lies in the numerical characteristics of the data. Therefore, prior to conducting CFA, survey questionnaires are typically constructed through EFA to reveal the underlying structure and relationships between observed variables and the latent structure.

In contrast, CFA tests the hypothesized model structure under specific theoretical assumptions or structural hypotheses, including the interrelationships among factors and the known number of factors. Its purpose is to validate the hypothesized model structure. Thus, the initial validity of the questionnaire structure, established through EFA, necessitates further confirmation through CFA 57 , 70 . Additionally, a sample size of at least 200 is recommended for conducting the validation factor analysis. In this study, confirmatory factor analysis was performed on a sample size of 317.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. All the experimental protocols were approved by the Zhengzhou College of Finance and Economics licensing committee.

Hariadi, B. et al. Higher order thinking skills based learning outcomes improvement with blended web mobile learning Model. Int. J. Instr. 15 (2), 565–578 (2022).

Google Scholar  

Sagala, P. N. & Andriani, A. Development of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) questions of probability theory subject based on bloom’s taxonomy. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025 (2019).

Article   Google Scholar  

Yudha, R. P. Higher order thinking skills (HOTS) test instrument: Validity and reliability analysis with the rasch model. Eduma Math. Educ. Learn. Teach. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v12i1.9468 (2023).

Leach, S. M., Immekus, J. C., French, B. F. & Hand, B. The factorial validity of the Cornell critical thinking tests: A multi-analytic approach. Think. Skills Creat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100676 (2020).

Noroozi, O., Dehghanzadeh, H. & Talaee, E. A systematic review on the impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills. Entertain. Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100369 (2020).

Supena, I., Darmuki, A. & Hariyadi, A. The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. Int. J. Instr. 14 (3), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a (2021).

Zhou, Y., Gan, L., Chen, J., Wijaya, T. T. & Li, Y. Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills assessment scale for pre-service teachers. Think. Skills Creat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101272 (2023).

Musfy, K., Sosa, M. & Ahmad, L. Interior design teaching methodology during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Interiority 3 (2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v3i2.100 (2020).

Yong, S. D., Kusumarini, Y. & Tedjokoesoemo, P. E. D. Interior design students’ perception for AutoCAD SketchUp and Rhinoceros software usability. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/490/1/012015 (2020).

Anthony, B. et al. Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 27 (2), 531–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z (2020).

Castro, R. Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Edu. Inf. Technol. 24 (4), 2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3 (2019).

Alismaiel, O. Develop a new model to measure the blended learning environments through students’ cognitive presence and critical thinking skills. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 17 (12), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i12.30141 (2022).

Gao, Y. Blended teaching strategies for art design major courses in colleges. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i24.19033 (2020).

Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J. & Drachsler, H. Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?. Int. J. Edu. Technol. Higher Edu. 21 (1), 23 (2024).

Ji, J. A Design on Blended Learning to Improve College English Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills. https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i4.2553 (2021).

Noroozi, O. The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education. Innov. Edu. Teach. Int. 60 (4), 501–512 (2023).

Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. & Mulder, M. First- and second-order scaffolding of argumentation competence and domain-specific knowledge acquisition: A systematic review. Technol. Pedag. Edu. 28 (3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2019.1612772 (2019).

Narasuman, S. & Wilson, D. M. Investigating teachers’ implementation and strategies on higher order thinking skills in school based assessment instruments. Asian J. Univ. Edu. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8991 (2020).

Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. & Mulder, M. Argumentation competence: Students’ argumentation knowledge, behavior and attitude and their relationships with domain-specific knowledge acquisition. J. Constr. Psychol. 35 (1), 123–145 (2022).

Johansson, E. The Assessment of Higher-order Thinking Skills in Online EFL Courses: A Quantitative Content Analysis (2020).

Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A. & Mulder, M. Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first- to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 30 (1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z (2017).

Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M. & Chizari, M. Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Comput. Educ. 61 , 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013 (2013).

Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M. & Chizari, M. Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educ. Res. Rev. 7 (2), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006 (2012).

Setiawan, Baiq Niswatul Khair, Ratnadi Ratnadi, Mansur Hakim, & Istiningsih, S. Developing HOTS-Based Assessment Instrument for Primary Schools (2019).

Suparman, S., Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. Does Problem-Based Learning Enhance Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics Learning? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2021 4th International Conference on Big Data and Education (2021).

Goodsett, M. Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information literacy online learning objects. J. Acad. Lib. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163 (2020).

Putra, I. N. A. J., Budiarta, L. G. R., & Adnyayanti, N. L. P. E. Developing Authentic Assessment Rubric Based on HOTS Learning Activities for EFL Teachers. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Languages and Arts across Cultures (ICLAAC 2022) (pp. 155–164). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-29-9_17 .

Bervell, B., Umar, I. N., Kumar, J. A., Asante Somuah, B. & Arkorful, V. Blended learning acceptance scale (BLAS) in distance higher education: Toward an initial development and validation. SAGE Open https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040073 (2021).

Byrne, D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual. Quant. 56 (3), 1391–1412 (2022).

Xu, W. & Zammit, K. Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 19 , 1609406920918810 (2020).

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qual. Psychol. 9 (1), 3 (2022).

Creswell, A., Shanahan, M., & Higgins, I. Selection-inference: Exploiting large language models for interpretable logical reasoning. arXiv:2205.09712 (2022).

Baron, J. Thinking and Deciding 155–156 (Cambridge University Press, 2023).

Book   Google Scholar  

Silver, N., Kaplan, M., LaVaque-Manty, D. & Meizlish, D. Using Reflection and Metacognition to Improve Student Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy (Taylor & Francis, 2023).

Oksuz, K., Cam, B. C., Kalkan, S. & Akbas, E. Imbalance problems in object detection: A review. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 43 (10), 3388–3415 (2020).

Saputra, M. D., Joyoatmojo, S., Wardani, D. K. & Sangka, K. B. Developing critical-thinking skills through the collaboration of jigsaw model with problem-based learning model. Int. J. Instr. 12 (1), 1077–1094 (2019).

Imam, H. & Zaheer, M. K. Shared leadership and project success: The roles of knowledge sharing, cohesion and trust in the team. Int. J. Project Manag. 39 (5), 463–473 (2021).

DeCastellarnau, A. A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: A literature review. Qual. Quant. 52 (4), 1523–1559 (2018).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Haber, J. Critical Thinking 145–146 (MIT Press, 2020).

Hanscomb, S. Critical Thinking: The Basics 180–181 (Routledge, 2023).

Sulaiman, W. S. W., Rahman, W. R. A. & Dzulkifli, M. A. Examining the construct validity of the adapted California critical thinking dispositions (CCTDI) among university students in Malaysia. Proc. Social Behav. Sci. 7 , 282–288 (2010).

Jaakkola, N. et al. Becoming self-aware—How do self-awareness and transformative learning fit in the sustainability competency discourse?. Front. Educ. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.855583 (2022).

Nguyen, T. T. B. Critical thinking: What it means in a Vietnamese tertiary EFL context. English For. Language Int. J. 2 (3), 4–23 (2022).

Henriksen, D., Gretter, S. & Richardson, C. Design thinking and the practicing teacher: Addressing problems of practice in teacher education. Teach. Educ. 31 (2), 209–229 (2020).

Okes, D. Root cause analysis: The core of problem solving and corrective action 179–180 (Quality Press, 2019).

Eroğlu, S. & Bektaş, O. The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science. Learn. Individual Differ. 98 , 102181 (2022).

Dzurilla, T. J. & Nezu, A. M. Development and preliminary evaluation of the social problem-solving inventory. Psychol. Assess. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2 (2), 156 (1990).

Tan, O.-S. Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Gale Cengage Learning (2021).

Driskell, J. E., Salas, E. & Driskell, T. Foundations of teamwork and collaboration. Am. Psychol. 73 (4), 334 (2018).

Lower, L. M., Newman, T. J. & Anderson-Butcher, D. Validity and reliability of the teamwork scale for youth. Res. Social Work Pract. 27 (6), 716–725 (2017).

Landa, R. Advertising by design: generating and designing creative ideas across media (Wiley, 2021).

Tang, T., Vezzani, V. & Eriksson, V. Developing critical thinking, collective creativity skills and problem solving through playful design jams. Think. Skills Creat. 37 , 100696 (2020).

Torrance, E. P. Torrance tests of creative thinking. Educational and psychological measurement (1966).

Javadi, M. H., Khoshnami, M. S., Noruzi, S. & Rahmani, R. Health anxiety and social health among health care workers and health volunteers exposed to coronavirus disease in Iran: A structural equation modeling. J. Affect. Disord. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100321 (2022).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 6 (1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 (1999).

Matsunaga, M. Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Commun. Methods Measures 2 (4), 260–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450802458935 (2008).

Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D. & Kaur, G. Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Ann. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 10 (1), 85–110 (2014).

Song, Y., Lee, Y. & Lee, J. Mediating effects of self-directed learning on the relationship between critical thinking and problem-solving in student nurses attending online classes: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Nurse Educ. Today https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105227 (2022).

Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning from theory to practice . Springer (2021).

Eliyasni, R., Kenedi, A. K. & Sayer, I. M. Blended learning and project based learning: the method to improve students’ higher order thinking skill (HOTS). Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan 4 (2), 231–248 (2019).

Yusuf, P. & Istiyono,. Blended learning: Its effect towards higher order thinking skills (HOTS). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012039 (2021).

Byron, K., Keem, S., Darden, T., Shalley, C. E. & Zhou, J. Building blocks of idea generation and implementation in teams: A meta-analysis of team design and team creativity and innovation. Personn. Psychol. 76 (1), 249–278 (2023).

Walid, A., Sajidan, S., Ramli, M. & Kusumah, R. G. T. Construction of the assessment concept to measure students’ high order thinking skills. J. Edu. Gift. Young Sci. 7 (2), 237–251 (2019).

Alawad, A. Evaluating online learning practice in the interior design studio. Int. J. Art Des. Edu. 40 (3), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12365 (2021).

Awuor, N. O., Weng, C. & Militar, R. Teamwork competency and satisfaction in online group project-based engineering course: The cross-level moderating effect of collective efficacy and flipped instruction. Comput. Educ. 176 , 104357 (2022).

Noroozi, O., Alqassab, M., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K. & Panadero, E. Does perception mean learning? Insights from an online peer feedback setting. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2345669 (2024).

Creswell, J. W. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications124–125 (2021) .

Tashakkori, A., Johnson, R. B., & Teddlie, C. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications 180–181(2020).

Jiang, X., Lyons, M. D. & Huebner, E. S. An examination of the reciprocal relations between life satisfaction and social problem solving in early adolescents. J. Adolescence 53 (1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.004 (2016).

Orcan, F. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Which one to use first. Egitimde ve Psikolojide Olçme ve Degerlendirme Dergisi https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.394323 (2018).

Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct. Eq. Model. Multidiscip. J. 16 (3), 397–438 (2009).

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Finch, H., French, B. F., & Immekus, J. C. Applied psychometrics using spss and amos. IAP (2016).

Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Dicke, T., Parker, P. D. & Craven, R. G. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony. Multivar. Behav. Res. 55 (1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503 (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the editorial team and reviewers of Scientific Reports for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Education, SEGI University, 47810 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Department of Art and Design, Zhengzhou College of Finance and Economics, Zhengzhou, 450000, Henan, China

Xiaolei Fan

Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, 999078, Taipa, Macao, Special Administrative Region of China

Lingchao Meng

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

D.L. Conceptualized a text experiment, and wrote the main manuscript text. D.L. and X.F. conducted experiments, D.L., X.F. and L.M. analyzed the results. L.M. contributed to the conceptualization, methodology and editing, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lingchao Meng .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Li, D., Fan, X. & Meng, L. Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning. Sci Rep 14 , 20287 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70908-3

Download citation

Received : 28 February 2024

Accepted : 22 August 2024

Published : 31 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70908-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Assessment scale
• Higher-order thinking skills
• Interior design
• Blended learning

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

The impact of cognitive flexibility on prospective EFL teachers' critical thinking disposition: the mediating role of self-efficacy

• Research Article
• Published: 31 August 2024

Cite this article

• Şenol Orakcı   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-1310 1 &
• Tahmineh Khalili   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-0991 2  

Critical thinking as one of the key skills for success in the 21st-century has been considered by many scholars in teacher education. This study tries to examine the interaction of critical thinking disposition with two other key characteristics of successful teachers: cognitive flexibility and self-efficacy. To this end, a sample of pre-service English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers was selected for this study. Based on the findings, a positive and strong relationship between cognitive flexibility and critical thinking disposition, and a positive and robust correlation between self-efficacy and critical thinking disposition were observed. Hence, it can be suggested that teacher-educationists can use this link for designing teacher-training courses with tailored tasks for both in and pre-service teachers. The main contribution of the findings might be beneficial for homogenizing teacher-training courses around the globe with the 21st-century trends. In addition, this line of research can be followed by empirical studies for checking the effectiveness of tailored tasks for provoking teachers’ critical thinking dispositions, cognitive flexibility, and self-efficacy in teaching activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Assessing the Contribution of Autonomy and Self-Efficacy to EFL Teachers’ Self-Regulation

Learning-oriented assessment in the classroom: the contribution of self-assessment and critical thinking to EFL learners’ academic engagement and self-esteem

Measuring in-service teacher self-efficacy for teaching computational thinking: development and validation of the T-STEM CT

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Data availability

Data will be made available on request. The final datasets of the current study are available from the author on a strong reasonable request.

Ajzen I (2020) The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behav Emerg Technol 2(4):314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Article   Google Scholar  

Akbar RA (2023) Critical thinking as a twenty first century skill. J Educ Res Soc Sci Rev (JERSSR) 3(1):8–15

Google Scholar  

Artino AR (2008) Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training. J Comput Assist Learn 24(3):260–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x

Atkinson, S. (2024). Literary Creation and the Fusion of Critical Thinking: Project-Centered Teaching Strategies in Australian Higher Education at the Beginning of the 21st Century.  Research and Advances in Education ,  3 (1), 44–53. etrieved from https://www.paradigmpress.org/rae/article/view/983

Awouda A, Traini E, Asranov M, Chiabert P (2024) Bloom’s IoT Taxonomy towards an effective Industry 4.0 education: case study on open-source IoT laboratory. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12468-7

Bacangallo LB, Buella RT, Rentasan KY, Pentang JT, Bautista RM (2022) Creative thinking and problem-solving: can preservice teachers think creatively and solve statistics problems? Stud Technol Educ 1(1):14–27

Baky, N. A. H. A. A. (2024). Designing an Assistant Application for Teachers with Varying Cognitive Flexibility to Use the Pedagogical Applications Wheel as a Reference Tool to Improve the Integration of Technology into Classrooms Preparation.  Kurdish Studies ,  12 (2), 1157–1188. Retrieved from https://kurdishstudies.net/menu-script/index.php/KS/article/view/1976

Bandura A (1978) Social learning theory of aggression. J Commun 28(3):12–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Bandura A (2006) Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T (eds) Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, vol 5. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp 307–337

Bandura, A., & Watts, R. E. (1996). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy , 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.10.4.313

Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1994). Self-efficacy (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). na.

Bariroh, N. M., Triyanto, T., & Fitriana, L. (2023, January). Critical thinking ability of students at SMPN 2 Kudus with impulsive cognitive style on two variables linear equation system material. In  AIP Conference Proceedings  (Vol. 2540, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105903

Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Beswick K, Fraser S (2019) Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM Mathematics Education 51:955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2

Bezanilla MJ, Fernández-Nogueira D, Poblete M, Galindo-Domínguez H (2019) Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: the teacher’s view. Think Skills Creat 33:100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584

Brečka P, Valentová M, Lančarič D (2022) The implementation of critical thinking development strategies into technology education: the evidence from Slovakia. Teach Teach Educ 109:103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103555

Buku, M. N. I., Corebima A. D, & Fatchur, R. (2016). The correlation between metacognitive skills and the critical thinking skills of the senior high school students in biology learning through the implementation of problem-based learning (pbl) in Malang, Indonesia. Int. Journal of Academic Research and Development . 1 (5): 58-63.

Bunt B, Gouws G (2020) Using an artificial life simulation to enhance reflective critical thinking among student teachers. Smart Learn Environ 7(1):1–19

Campo L, Galindo-Domínguez H, Bezanilla MJ, Fernández-Nogueira D, Poblete M (2023) Methodologies for fostering critical thinking skills from university students’ points of view. Educ Sci 13(2):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020132

Canas JJ, Fajardo I, Salmeron L (2006) Cognitive flexibility. Int Encycl Ergonomics Human Factors. 1:296–301

Chevalier N, Blaye A (2008) Cognitive flexibility in preschoolers: The role of representation activation and maintenance. Dev Sci 11(3):339–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00679.x

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Cottrell S (2023) Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection. Bloomsbury Publishing

Cragg L, Chevalier N (2012) The processes underlying flexibility in childhood. Q J Exp Psychol 65(2):209–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747021090320461

Cáceres M, Nussbaum M, Ortiz J (2020) Integrating critical thinking into the classroom: a teacher’s perspective. Think Skills Creat 37:100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100674

Dajani DR, Uddin LQ (2015) Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends Neurosci 38(9):571–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Davies M (2015) A model of critical thinking in higher education. Higher Educ: Handb Theory Res: 30:41–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12835-1_2

Dawson DL, Golijani-Moghaddam N (2020) COVID-19: psychological flexibility, coping, mental health, and wellbeing in the UK during the pandemic. J Contextual Behav Sci 17:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.010

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

De-La-Peña C, Fernádez-Cézar R, Solano-Pinto N (2021) Attitude toward mathematics of future teachers: how important are creativity and cognitive flexibility? Front Psychol 12:713941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713941

Dehghani M, Pakmehr H, Malekzadeh A (2011) relationship between students’ critical thinking and self-efficacy beliefs in ferdowsi university of Mashhad. Iran Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 15:2952–2955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.221

Demirtaş AS (2020) Cognitive flexibility and mental wellbeing in Turkish adolescents: the mediating role of academic, social, and emotional self-efficacy. Anales De Psicología 36(1):111–121. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.336681

Dennis JP, Vander Wal JS (2010) The cognitive flexibility inventory: instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cogn Ther Res 34(3):241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4

Deák GO, Wiseheart M (2015) Cognitive flexibility in young children: general or task-specific capacity? J Exp Child Psychol 138:31–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.003

Doğan Laçin BG, Yalçın İ (2019) Üniversite öğrencilerinde öz-yeterlilik ve stresle başa çıkma stratejilerinin bilişsel esnekliği yordama düzeyleri. Hacet Üniv EğItim Fakültesi Dergisi. 34(2):358–371

Edmunds DB (2007) The impact of a cognitive flexibility hypermedia system on preservice teachers’ sense of self-efficacy. University of North Carolina, Masterís Paper

Eghtesadi, A., & Jeddi, A. (2019). Teachers’ Critical Thinking and Self-efficacy as Predictors of their Pedagogical Success.  International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8 (1), 62–70. Retrieved from  https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/5246

Elder L, Paul R (1996) Critical thinking: a stage theory of critical thinking: part I. J Dev Educ 20(1):34

Emiru EK, Gedifew MT (2024) The effect of teacher self-efficacy on learning engagement of secondary school students. Cogent Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308432

Ennis RH (1993) Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice 32(3):179–186

Esen Aygün H (2018) The relationship between pre–service teachers’ cognitive flexibility and interpersonal problem solving skills. Eurasian J Educ Res 77:105–128

Esen BK, Özcan HD, Sezgin M (2017) High school students’ cognitive flexibility is predicted by self-efficacy and achievement. Eur J Educ Stud 3(2):143–151. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.244470

Exintaris B, Karunaratne N, Yuriev E (2023) Metacognition and critical thinking: using chatgpt-generated responses as prompts for critique in a problem-solving workshop (SMARTCHEMPer). J Chem Educ 100(8):2972–2980

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Filgona J, Sakiyo J, Gwany DM, Okoronka AU (2020) Motivation in learning. Asian J Educ Soc Stud 10(4):16–37. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273

Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching children to think . Nelson Thornes Ltd

Fraenkel RJ, Wallen EN (2006) How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill

Gelles LA, Lord SM, Hoople GD, Chen DA, Mejia JA (2020) Compassionate flexibility and self-discipline: student adaptation to emergency remote teaching in an integrated engineering energy course during COVID-19. Educ Sci 10(11):304. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110304

Gibbs S, Powell B (2012) Teacher efficacy and pupil behavior: the structure of teachers’ individual and collective beliefs and their relationship with numbers of pupils excluded from school. Br J Educ Psychol 82(4):564–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02046.x

Gill, S.A., Bencheva, N., Karayel, S., & Usman, M. (2021). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy moderate effects of cognitive flexibility and entrepreneurial alertness on entrepreneurial intentions Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review . https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.09030

Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2011). From EFL to ESL: evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English.  Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap , 55–78.

Golja T, Clerke T( 2020) Towards understanding the development of 21st century capabilities: A scoping review of critical thinking. ICERI2020 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2020.1644

Greene JA, Yu SB (2016) Educating critical thinkers: the role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci 3(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622223

Gupta P, Bamel U (2023) Need for metacognition and critical thinking in the e-learning ecosystem: the new normal in post covid era. Glob Bus Organ Excell. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22208

Güner P, Gökçe S (2021) Linking critical thinking disposition, cognitive flexibility, and achievement: math anxiety’s mediating role. J Educ Res 114(5):458–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1975618

Halonen JS (1995) Demystifying critical thinking. Teach Psychol 22(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2201_23

Hamann KR, Wullenkord MC, Reese G, van Zomeren M (2024) Believing that we can change our world for the better: a triple-a (agent-action-aim) framework of self-efficacy beliefs in the context of collective social and ecological aims. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 28(1):11–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683231178

Hascher T, Waber J (2021) Teacher well-being: a systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019. Educational Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411

Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach . Guilford Publications

Hermita N, Ware A, Wijaya T, Zhou Y (2021) Improving the creative thinking skills of the next generation of mathematics teachers using dynamic mathematics software. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 16(13):212–226. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i13.21535

Hershkovitz A, Daniel E, Klein Y, Shacham M (2023) Technology integration in emergency remote teaching: teachers’ self-efficacy and sense of success. Educ Inf Technol 28(10):12433–12464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11688-7

Hu W, Jia X, Plucker JA, Shan X (2016) Effects of a critical thinking skills program on the learning motivation of primary school students. Roeper Rev: A J Gifted Educ 38(2):70–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1150374

Huang J, Sang G (2023) Conceptualising critical thinking and its research in teacher education: a systematic review. Teach Teach. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2212364

Hursen C (2021) The effect of problem-based learning method supported by web 2.0 tools on academic achievement and critical thinking skills in teacher education. Technol Knowl Learn 26:515–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09458-2

Ionescu T (2012) Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas Psychol 30(2):190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001

Jabari S, Esmaeelbeygi HM (2017) The role of critical thinking in predicting self-efficacy. Mod J Lang Teach Methods. 7(8):550–554

Jacques S, Zelazo PD (2005) On the possible roots of cognitive flexibility. In: Homer BD, Tamis-LeMonda CS (eds) The development of social cognition and communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 53–81

Johnson, B. T. (2016). The relationship between cognitive flexibility, coping and symptomatology in psychotherapy . (Dissertation/Thesis), ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Kamalizad J, Samuel M (2016) The role of EFL/ESL settings in using language learning strategies. Asian EFL J Q 18(1):75–108

Karaca-Atik A, Meeuwisse M, Gorgievski M, Smeets G (2023) Uncovering important 21st-century skills for sustainable career development of social sciences graduates: a systematic review. Educ Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100528

Kartal E, Onbaşı Sİ, İlhan EL (2024) Examining the relationship between self-efficacy and cognitive flexibility of physical education and sports teachers towards inclusive education. Ankara Univ Fac Educ Sci J Spec Educ. 25(2):141–154

Kazu H, Pullu S (2023) Cognitive flexibility levels and self-efficacy perceptions of preservice teachers. Disco Commun Sustain Educ 14(1):36–47. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2023-0004

Khalili T, Ketabi S, Pnevmatikos D, Nejadansari Mahabadi D (2024) A meta-analysis on the (quasi) experimental studies of critical thinking in second language education in Iran. Lang Relat Res 14(6):245–270

Kim, D. (2016).  Role of cognitive flexibility in bilingualism and creativity  (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).

Klassen RM, Tze VM, Betts SM, Gordon KA (2011) Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educ Psychol Rev 23(1):21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8

Kuiper RA, Murdock N, Grant N (2010) Thinking strategies of baccalaureate nursing students prompted by self-regulated learning strategies. J Nurs Educ 49(8):429–436. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20100430-01

Lackner JM, Gudleski GD, Radziwon CD, Krasner SS, Firth RS, Naliboff BD, Vargovich AM, Borden AB, Mayer EA (2022) Cognitive flexibility improves in cognitive behavioral therapy for irritable bowel syndrome but not nonspecific education/support. Behav Res Ther 154:104033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104033

Lauermann F, Berger JL (2021) Linking teacher self-efficacy and responsibility with teachers’ self-reported and student-reported motivating styles and student engagement. Learn Instr 76:101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101441

Leclercq M, Gimenes G, Maintenant C, Clerc J (2023) goal choice in preschoolers is influenced by context, cognitive flexibility, and metacognition. Front Psychol 13:8257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063566

Li S (2023) Enhancing professional success: Chinese EFL teachers’ workplace buoyancy and cognitive flexibility. Heliyon 9(2):e13394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13394

Liu Y, Bellibaş MŞ, Gümüş S (2020) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educ Manag Adm Leadersh 49(3):430–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438

Lorencová H, Jarošová E, Avgitidou S, Dimitriadou C (2019) Critical thinking practices in teacher education programmes: a systematic review. Stud High Educ 44(5):844–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586331

Luft A (2020) Theorizing moral cognition: culture in action, situations, and relationships. Socius. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120916125

Ma L, Liu N (2023) Teacher belief about integrating critical thinking in english teaching in China. J Educ Teach 49(1):137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2044267

Mafarja N, Zulnaidi H (2022) Relationship between critical thinking and academic self-concept: an experimental study of Reciprocal teaching strategy. Think Skills Creat 45:101113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101113

Maknun J (2023) Development of Critical Thinking Skills Through Science Learning. Integrated Education and Learning. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 129–141

Malkoç A, Aydın Sünbül ZEYNEP (2020) The relationship between emotional literacy, cognitive flexibility and counseling self-efficacy of senior students in psychology and psychological counseling and guidance. Educ Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2019.3848

Martin MM, Anderson CM (1998) The cognitive flexibility scale: three validity studies. Commun Rep 11(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219809367680

Martin MM, Rubin RB (1995) A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychol Rep 76(2):623–626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623

Mena J, Peinado C, Hernández I (2023) Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs on their role as teachers during the practicum. Teacher Education as an Ongoing Professional Trajectory: Implications for Policy and Practice. Springer International Publishing, Cham, p 71

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Meyers C (1986) Teaching students to think critically. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA

Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino A (2006) Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

Mudhar G, Ertesvåg SK, Pakarinen E (2024) Patterns of teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education associated with teacher emotional support, collective teacher efficacy, and collegial collaboration. Eur J Spec Needs Educ 39(3):446–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2233297

Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Gerber HR (2019) (Emotion-centered) problem-solving therapy: an update. Australian Psychol 54(5):361–371

Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & D'Zurilla, T. (2012). Problem-solving therapy: A treatment manual . Springer publishing company

Oner D, Aggul YG (2023) Critical thinking for teachers. Integrated Education and Learning. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 319–336

Orakcı Ş, Durnali M (2023) The mediating effects of metacognition and creative thinking on the relationship between teachers’ autonomy support and teachers’ self efficacy. Psychol Sch 60(1):162–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22770

Orakcı Ş, Durnali M, Aktan O (2019) Fostering Critical Thinking Using Instructional Strategies in English Classes. In: Robinson S, Knight V (eds) Handbook of Research on Critical Thinking and Teacher Education Pedagogy. IGI Global, pp 299–316

Orakcı Ş, Khalili T (2024) Iranian and Turkish EFL instructors’ Critical Openness. A comparative study. Heliyon, Reflective Skepticism, Innovative Thinking and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29097

Book   Google Scholar  

Paul RW (1990) Critical Thinking. Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, Pennycook

Paul R, Elder L (2019) The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield

Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2001). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life . Prentice Hal

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006).  Critical thinking competency standards . Dillon Beach: Foundation for critical thinking.

Pepe Ş (2021) The relationship between academic self-efficacy and cognitive flexibility: physical education and sports teacher candidates. Propósitos y Representaciones 9(2):113

Phan HP (2009) Relations between goals, self-efficacy, critical thinking, and deep processing strategies: a path analysis. Educ Psychol 29(7):777–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903289423

Pollarolo E, Størksen I, Skarstein TH, Kucirkova N (2023) Children’s critical thinking skills: perceptions of norwegian early childhood educators. Eur Early Child Educ Res J 31(2):259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2022.2081349

Preiss DD (2022) Metacognition, mind wandering, and cognitive flexibility: understanding creativity. J Intelligence 10(3):69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030069

Prifti R (2022) Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Op Learn: J Op, Distance e-Learn 37(2):111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1755642

Pöllänen E, Osika W, Bojner Horwitz E, Wamsler C (2023) Education for sustainability: understanding processes of change across individual, collective, and system levels. Challenges 14(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe14010005

Qiang R, Han Q, Guo Y, Bai J, Karwowski M (2020) Critical thinking disposition and scientific creativity: the mediating role of creative self-efficacy. J Creat Behav 54(1):90–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.347

Qiang RC, Han Q, Guo YY, Bai J, Karwowski M (2021) Critical thinking disposition and scientific creativity: the mediating role of creative self-efficacy. J Creat Behav 54(1):90–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.347

R Kupriyanov, E Valeeva, N S Valeyeva, S Ketabi, T Khalili. (2021). The role of metacognition and critical thinking for engineering students in EFL learning. In  Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2020), Volume 2 23  (pp. 96–106). Springer International Publishing.

Ramanathan V, Ariffin MZ, Goh GD, Goh GL, Rikat MA, Tan XX, Campolo D (2023) The design and development of instrumented toys for the assessment of infant cognitive flexibility. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052709

Rezaei S, Derakhshan A, Bagherkazemi M (2011) Critical thinking in language education. J Lang Teach Res 2(4):769. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.4.733-739

Richards JB, Hayes MM, Schwartzstein RM (2020) Teaching clinical reasoning and critical thinking: from cognitive theory to practical application. Chest 158(4):1617–1628

Rudd RD (2007) Defining critical thinking. Tech Connect Educ Careers. 82(7):46–49

Ruppar A, Kurth J, Bubash S, Lockman Turner E (2023) A framework for preparing to teach students with extensive support needs in the 21st century. Teach Educ Spec Educ 46(1):26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211059853

Rönnlund M, Ledman K, Nylund M, Rosvall PÅ (2019) Life skills for ‘real life’: how critical thinking is contextualised across vocational programmes. Educ Res 61(3):302–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1633942

Sadeghi B, Hassani MT, Rahmatkhah M (2014) The relationship between EFL learners’ metacognitive strategies, and their critical thinking. J Lang Teach Res 5(5):1167–1175

Sang G, Valcke M, Braak JV, Tondeur J (2010) Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Comput Educ 54(1):103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010

Santana AN, de Roazzi A, Nobre APMC (2022) The relationship between cognitive flexibility and mathematical performance in children: a meta-analysis. Trends Neurosci Educ 28:100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2022.100179

Saputro AD, Atun S, Wilujeng I, Ariyanto A, Arifin S (2020) Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers’ self-efficacy and critical thinking using problem-based learning. Eur J Educ Res 9(5):765–773

Saud WI (2019) Contrastive analysis of ESL and EFL learning strategies. J Lang Teach Res. 10(2):311–321

Scheibling-Sève C, Pasquinelli E, Sander E (2022) Critical thinking and flexibility. In: Clément E (ed) Cognitive flexibility: The cornerstone of learning. ISTE Ltd and Wiley, pp 77–112

Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A (2008) How to overcome health-compromising behaviors: the health action process approach. Eur Psychol 13(2):141–151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.141

Shaabani F, Maktabi GH, Yeylagh MS, Morovati Z (2011) The relationship between academic self-efficacy and creativity with critical thinking in university students. J Educ Manag Stud 1(1):32–37

Shahzad K, Naureen S (2017) Impact of teacher self-efficacy on secondary school students’ academic achievement. J Educ Educ Dev. 4(1):48–72

Shaw PA, Traunter JE, Nguyen N, Huong TT, Thao-Do TP (2021) Immersive-learning experiences in real-life contexts: deconstructing and reconstructing Vietnamese kindergarten teachers’ understanding of STEAM education. Int J Early Years Educ 29(3):329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2021.1933920

Shimogori, Y. (2013). Impact of Biculturalism on Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Flexibility of Japanese Adults . Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Claremont Graduate University and San Diego State University.

Sosu EM (2013) The development and psychometric validation of a critical thinking disposition scale. Think Skills Creat 9:107–119

Spiro RJ, Klautke HA, Cheng C, Gaunt A (2017) Cognitive flexibility theory and the assessment of 21st-century skills. In: Secolsky C, Denison DB (eds) Handbook on measurement, assessment, and evaluation in higher education. Routledge, NY, pp 631–637

Stein KC, Miness A, Kintz T (2018) Teachers’ cognitive flexibility on engagement and their ability to engage students: a theoretical and empirical exploration. Teach Coll Rec 120(6):1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000607

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson, Boston

Taguchi N (2008) The role of learning environment in the development of pragmaticcomprehension: a comparison of gains between EFL and ESL learners. Stud Insecond Lang Acquis 30(4):423–452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080716

Taşgın A, Dilek Ç (2023) The mediating role of critical thinking dispositions between secondary school student’s self-efficacy and problem-solving skills. Think Skills Creat 50:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101400

Tolan ÖÇ, KARA BC (2023) The Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility in the Relationship between Social Anxiety and General Self-Efficacy. E-Int J Educ Res. 14(1):229–244

Topno I (2020) Attitude towards development of creative thinking among prospective teachers. Int J Creat Res Thoughts. 8(3):1684–1689

Toprak E, Metin A, Ünalan D (2023) The mediating role of cognitive flexibility and critical thinking in the relationship between academic motivation and fear of negative evaluation. Psychol Sch. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23080

Tschannen-Moran M, McMaster P (2009) Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. Elem Sch J 110(2):228–245. https://doi.org/10.1086/605771

Tschannen-Moran M, Woolfolk Hoy A (2001) Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teach Teach Educ 17:783–805

Uddin LQ (2021) Cognitive and behavioural flexibility: neural mechanisms and clinical0considerations. Nat Rev Neurosci 22(3):167–179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00428-w

Uskola A (2022) Fostering Critical Thinking About Health Issues: Facts of Success and Failure in the Case of Homeopathy. Critical Thinking in Biology and Environmental Education: Facing Challenges in a Post-Truth World. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 147–166

Voogt J, Erstad O, Dede C, Mishra P (2013) Challenges to learning and schooling in the digitalnetworked world of the 21st century. J Comput Assist Learn 29(5):403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029

Wang D, Jia Q (2023) Twenty years of research development on teachers’ critical thinking: current status and future implications——a bibliometric analysis of research articles collected in WOS. Think Skills Creat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101252

Wanga S-L, Wub P-Y (2008) The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: the social cognitive perspective. Comput Educ 51:1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004

Watts R, Luoma JB (2020) The use of the psychological flexibility model to support psychedelic assisted therapy. J Contextual Behav Sci 15:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.12.004

Wen T, Geddert RM, Madlon-Kay S, Egner T (2023) Transfer of learned cognitive flexibility to novel stimuli and task sets. Psychol Sci 34(4):435–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221141854

West RF, Toplak ME, Stanovich KE (2008) Heuristics and biases as measures of criticalthinking: associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. J Educ Psychol 100(4):930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012842

Yu DSF, De Maria M, Barbaranelli C, Vellone E, Matarese M, Ausili D, Riegel B (2021) Cross-cultural applicability of the self-care self-efficacy scale in a multi-national study. J Adv Nurs 77(2):681–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14617

Yuan R, Yang M, Stapleton P (2020) Enhancing undergraduates’ critical thinking through research engagement: a practitioner research approach. Think Skills Creat 38:100737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100737

Zaragoza MC, Díaz-Gibson J, Caparrós AF, Solé SL (2021) The teacher of the 21st century: professional competencies in catalonia today. Educ Stud 47(2):217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1686697

Zee M, Koomen HM (2016) Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: a synthesis of 40 years of research. Rev Educ Res 86(4):981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801

Zhang Y, Bian Y, Wu H, Tang W, Li Q (2023) Intuition or rationality: Impact of critical thinking dispositions on the cognitive processing of creative information. Think Skills Creat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101278

Zhang H, Yuan R, He X (2020) Investigating university EFL teachers’ perceptions of critical thinking and its teaching: voices from China. Asia Pac Educ Res 29:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00500-6

Zheng W, Akaliyski P, Ma C, Xu Y (2024) Cognitive flexibility and academic performance: individual and cross-national patterns among adolescents in 57 countries. Personality Individ Differ 217:112455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112455

Zhou Y, Gan L, Chen J, Wijaya TT, Li Y (2023) Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills assessment scale for pre-service teachers. Thinking Skills Creat 48:101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101272

Zou D, Xie H, Wang FL (2023) Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning. J Comput High Educ 35(1):166–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09337-y

Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2014). The relation between cognitive flexibility and academic, social, and emotional self-efficacy beliefs among adolescents. Egitim ve Bilim . https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3467

Çetin İ, Padır MA, Çoğaltay N (2023) Examining the relationship between cognitive flexibility and effective problem solving skills in school principals: a canonical correlation analysis. J Human Soc Sci Res. 12(5):2442–2457

Çuhadaroğlu A (2013) Bilişsel esnekliğin yordayıcıları. Cumhuriyet Int J Educ 2(1):86–101

Öztürk, K., Denkci-Akkaş, D., & Tikiz-Ertürk, G. (2022). Pre-service EFL Teachers' Perceptions Regarding Their Critical Reading Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Flexibility, The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 22 (2), 121–137. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1359299

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation’ to anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey

Şenol Orakcı

Department of English Language and Literature, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

Tahmineh Khalili

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Şenol Orakcı .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Ethical Approval

Ethics committee approval was obtained from "Aksaray University Human Research Ethics Committee" before starting the research (Date: 03.03.2023, Decision no: 2023/01- 35).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.

Human or Animal Rigth

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. We, as an author, accept statements below on compliance with ethical standards and standards of research involving humans.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Editors: Mikkel Wallentin (University of Aarhus), Johanne S.K. Nedergaard (University of Copenhagen); Reviewers: Enrico Pollarolo (University of Stavanger) and a second researcher who prefers to remain anonymous.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Orakcı, Ş., Khalili, T. The impact of cognitive flexibility on prospective EFL teachers' critical thinking disposition: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Cogn Process (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01227-8

Download citation

Received : 22 March 2024

Accepted : 22 August 2024

Published : 31 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01227-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• EFL teachers
• Cognitive flexibility
• Critical thinking disposition
• Self-efficacy
• Correlation
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research